Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walt who wrote (1792)	12/16/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2251

Walt, Thanks for the post. Here's a question for you that has been bothering me. The 6/24/97 and 7/14/97 NRs sets out the results and grades of the dyke samples, but the 7/29/97 NR gives us the results from A186, the breccia, which is a lot less exciting: winspear.com I guess my questions are: 1. Do we know that the drill holes we're awaiting results on should be similar to the "good" holes and not A186? Why? 2. Do we have any way of knowing the economics of A186 and similar kimberlite in case there is a lot of it at Snap? 3. If they find a source, what would you guess that the values would be in a pipe(s)? Does the geology tell us anything about its chances of being better or worse than Aber's or Diamet's pipes? Thanks.