SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bananawind who wrote (19853)12/16/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ericsson Says, "Its A Coincidence">
Advertise on Total Telecom

Ericsson Moves to End 3G Deadlock

By Sheridan Nye at CommunicationsWeek
International

15 December 1998

The long-running stalemate over a single global standard
for third-generation mobile appears to have been broken,
with a dramatic reversal of direction by L.M. Ericsson AB.

The dispute over rival 3G proposals had become a
nose-to-nose stand-off between Ericsson and Qualcomm
Inc. Both companies withheld Intellectual Property Rights
(IPR) to allegedly "essential" aspects of rival air-interface
technologies, cdma2000 and Wideband-CDMA, on
condition that the International Telecommunication Union
support their conflicting visions for IMT-2000, the ITU's
proposed global family of 3G standards.

While the vendors dug in, they came under increasing
pressure from the industry and the ITU to find a
compromise. Now Ericsson appears to have given way,
having relinquished its demand that the two
spread-spectrum technologies should develop separately.

"We can't keep on with this deadlock," said Eric Osterberg,
communications director, Ericsson Mobile Systems. "We
have to live with a family of standards, we don't need any
more delays. This could be a way forward to get these
systems aligned."

If the two vendors agree to pool their technologies and
IPRs, the world could see the first dual-mode handsets for
3G global roaming by 2001, Ericsson said.

The substance of Ericsson's offer is to harmonize
W-CDMA and cdma2000 technologies. Crucially, it has
conceded a lower chip rate, from 4.096 megahertz to 3.84
MHz. This effectively reduces the specified frequency
spread to within the smaller spectrum blocks allocated to 3G
in the United States. It also paves the way for backwards
compatibility with the core networks for the world's two
dominant 2G standards, GSM and cdmaOne, the
air-interface standard licensed by Qualcomm.

If an agreement is reached, the deal could avert a looming
trade war and would allow Qualcomm to target the
European market in force for the first time. U.S. trade
officials had complained that the European Union, through
its support for the Universal Terrestrial Radio Access
(UTRA) proposal based on W-CDMA, sought to shut U.S.
vendors out of Europe. This, they claimed, would be a
repeat of tactics the EU used when it mandated support for
GSM against the cdma alternative proposed by the United
States.

As CWI went to press, San Diego, California-based
Qualcomm welcomed the "positive development." But it
declined to comment on whether it would release its IPRs,
pending clarification on other outstanding technical
differences, such as base station synchronization.

Osterberg denied that Ericsson's decision amounted to a
climb-down. He also denied it came in response to a recent
ITU policy statement that reaffirmed its consensus view
that 3G should be based on a single global standard,
supporting global roaming. "Nothing has changed," said
Osterberg.

"This looks like a quick reaction [to the ITU], but it's a
coincidence. We've been working on this for some time."

Meanwhile, the European Telecommunications Standards
Institute has formed the 3G Partnership Project, a new joint
body with standards groups from Asia and the United
States to harmonize various 3G proposals with UTRA.



To: bananawind who wrote (19853)12/16/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Brazil News>
quote.bloomberg.com



To: bananawind who wrote (19853)12/16/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: JMD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Florid One, while it is true that my academic schedule sometimes prevents me staying as closely attuned to industry developments as I would prefer (orthogonal wave theory is some pretty meaty stuff if you catch my scent), I find it astonishing that Sprint SMS has found its way to an area in such a notoriously primitive state of technological development. Is it not true that in Southeast Florida the Sprint service is referred to as "Short Message, Long Delivery Time" or SMLDT as we technicians phrase it? :-) SM