Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (17437)	12/16/1998 5:39:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Your logic is somewhat offensive to me, Zeev. The Presidency becomes "imperial" as soon as the President is not subject to the same laws as us! You, personally, have made the judgement that this kind of law-breaking doesn't rise to the level of impeachment -- I disagree, but it's really academic and quite irrelevant. It's a matter for the house. How about my question -- do you trust BC to tell you the truth about everything that really matters to you as a citizen?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (17437)	12/16/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Zeev (and a very few others) - well said - we have here the classic symptoms of a sort of witch hunt band wagon effect. We're living through an extended farce - with the holier than thou strutting their stuff like peacocks. Mind you, form the very beginning this Iraq business has been a farce of the first order - broken promises all round. I distrust the official version of things to such an extent that I feel that it has become an imperative for the Americans (and their British lackeys, I'm ashamed to say) to attack and to find a pretext for such an attack. I wouldn't be surprised to learn in future years that the 'documents' that Iraq is supposed to produce don't actually exist and therefore cannot be produced. The timing of the attack is therefore one of expediency. I hope it kills the impeachment momentum. 'nuf said. e

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (17437)	12/16/1998 6:24:00 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

Zeev, I know you are a busy man, and probably didn't have time to listen to any of the J. Committee's impeachment hearings, much less to read any of the particulars of the IC report that specified the numerous instances of perjury/ obstruction/ abuse of power. So, I can make excuses for you in my own mind about why you fail to grasp the seriousness of these impeachment proceedings. I think it is regretable that you continue to make comments that reveal you are only superficially aware of the facts involved. Regretable, but understandable. But, I have a real problem with you not knowing what the constitutional language regarding impeachment is. At this point in time, I find it hard to believe that ANY American hasn't read and re-read the Constitution to get an idea of what the process is. Please, Zeev, click on the following URL and read what it says. law.cornell.edu Thanks for taking the time, jim