Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (43559)	12/16/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573073

Techweb: "AMD May Be Ready To Spin Off Vantis" techweb.com For the third quarter, Vantis' sales sequentially declined 3 percent, to $50 million, because of weakness in the Japanese market. Vantis represented 7 percent of AMD's revenue for the quarter. At 1.3-times sales, AMD as a whole is also considered undervalued, Randall said, while PLD-market leaders Altera and Xilinx are valued at five- to six-times sales. "I think Vantis is worth a lot more as a stand-alone company," Randall said. Traditionally, the PLD business has grown faster than the overall semiconductor market, and suppliers have enjoyed gross-profit margins in the range of 60 percent. In 1998, however, severe price erosion flattened the PLD market. In addition, AMD has made the microprocessor business the company's focus. Investing the necessary amount of R&D funding into both the microprocessor and PLD businesses is difficult enough; doing so during a period when AMD's cash needs are higher may make Vantis expendable, Peck said. If they sold 49% of Vantis for 4x sales, they'd have proceeds of $400M. I'd go out and use this money to buy something with a better strategic fit, like S3 Inc., which has a market cap of $250M and sales about the same. Petz

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (43559)	12/16/1998 7:06:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573073

<I think I read somewhere that Intel chips have 4 way associative (?) L1 cache, while AMD chips have 2 way associative (?) L1 cache. Could this explain why Katmai doesn't gain much, while the K7 should gain?> Not really. Associative-ness prevents cache-thrashing, which happens when a few cachelines compete for the same tag entry. AMD's 2-way set associative caches are more susceptible to cache-thrashing than Intel's 4-way design. A larger cache can relieve some of that cache-thrashing within 2-way designs, but it's unlikely that the symptom is that bad in the first place. Tenchusatsu