Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (21115)	12/17/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

After reading the article I thought, "Where is Hillary? Should not she be considered in taking those 'corresponding measures' to help Mr. Clinton? Everyone talks of how respected Clinton is. He is "respected" so long as he can offer some sort of benefit to a country, but he has lost his authority to act on principle. I disagree with the bombing because it simply has no principle. I did not approve of the 1991 bombing for several reasons, but at least then there was a basis upon which a principled attack on Iraq could be executed. After all, Iraq had invaded Kuwait. I therefore accepted the attack on this basis. I vociferously reject this current attack. It is a farce. As in the case of Sudan, Clinton has murdered innocent people to try and improve his political circumstances. There is no way this fiend attacked Iraq on the basis of sound principle. He did it for himself.