Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (39796)	12/17/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Skeeter, Re:please, you sound desperate. nobody beat bill. they investigated him for potential wrongdoing. when they found evidence, very strong and clear evidence, that he was a perjurer and that he obstructed justice then, and only then, did they do anything. all this was done with janet reno's blessing. who appointed janet reno? At least we agree on something! BK

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (39796)	12/17/1998 7:03:00 PM
From: Timothy Liu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

> nobody beat bill. I was just giving an example. If all the evidence is so strong, why only a couple Democrats vote for impreachment. Do tell me Republican somehow has higher moral standards. The point I was making is: 1. Clinton is not the only one responsible for the current situation. 2. The decision is partisan. Which means it does not matter if Clinton prejured or commited other offenses. Republicans are going to magnify it and Democrats are going to minimize it. If it is people in US who vote on impeachment, I wonder what the outcome will be. Reno learned her lesson. Who want to appoint another Ken Starr to investigate campaign finance? Tim