SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22502)12/19/1998 4:11:00 AM
From: Borzou Daragahi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Ignore this post, Republicans. It's just more propaganda from the liberal media.

nytimes.com

December 19, 1998

THE POLL

Republicans' Approval Rating Erodes in Polls

By RICHARD W. STEVENSON with MICHAEL R. KAGAY

WASHINGTON -- As the House of Representatives moved toward a vote on impeaching President Clinton, the Republican Party's standing with the public dropped significantly, matching its lowest rating in the past 14 years, the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll shows.

While impeachment appears all but inevitable, half of the public still expects some other outcome, suggesting at least the possibility of further erosion in the Republican Party's image when the reality of only the second impeachment of a President in American history sinks in.

Six of 10 Americans said Republicans in Congress were out of touch with the public's wishes on impeachment.

The opposition to impeachment -- 62 percent said they wanted their representative to vote against it -- is reflected in every sector of society: every region, age group and income group, with the exception of those respondents who described themselves as Republicans.

There were signs that public opinion could prove treacherous for Clinton in the weeks ahead: About 4 in 10 Americans believe it would be better for the country for Clinton to resign should the House send articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial.

Still, in many ways, the poll found remarkable stability in public opinion across a year of turmoil and scandal. The public continues to distinguish between the man and the President: as in January when the Lewinsky scandal was first disclosed, Americans are critical of Clinton's personal behavior but give high marks for his job performance.

Clinton's job-approval rating stands in sharp contrast to that of Richard M. Nixon after the House Judiciary Committee recommended his impeachment in 1974: 65 percent approved of Clinton's job performance this week, while only 24 percent held that view of Nixon just before his resignation.

The survey was based on telephone interviews conducted nationwide with 1,666 adults on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday, and another 326 on Thursday, after Clinton ordered the bombing of Iraq. The margin of sampling error for the entire poll is plus or minus two percentage points.

The survey found that, at least in this snapshot of public opinion, Republicans have paid a price for their aggressive pursuit of the President. The percentage of Americans who held a favorable view of the party -- 40 percent -- was at its lowest level in the 14 years that the New York Times/CBS News Poll has been asking the question, statistically matching the level of 43 percent recorded in early 1996 after a budget impasse resulted in a partial shutdown of the Federal Government.

In October, before the 1998 midterm elections, public opinion of the Republican Party was evenly split, 45 percent favorable and 46 percent unfavorable.

The party's image worsened as this week progressed: 42 percent of respondents had a favorable opinion of the Republicans early in the week; that dropped to 33 percent among people polled on Thursday, as the reality of impeachment set in and Washington grappled with the confluence of crises at home and abroad. The margin of sampling error for the one-night finding was plus or minus 6 percentage points.

By contrast, the number of people holding a favorable view of the Democratic party held steady during the week at 56 percent.

By a ratio of more than 2 to 1, Americans said that the impeachment vote should have been delayed while the United States engaged in military action against Iraq.

The survey also showed that, by a ratio of 2 to 1, Americans believe the timing of the air strikes had more to do with a need to respond to Saddam Hussein's defiance of United Nations weapons inspectors than with any effort by President Clinton to divert attention from impeachment.

The poll, intended to measure day-to-day shifts in public opinion during this climactic week, found that the public was only just beginning to recognize that the House was on the verge of impeaching Clinton.

On Sunday, 31 percent of respondents said they expected the House to impeach the President, with 50 percent predicting that the matter would be resolved through a compromise measure like censure.

By the eve of the anticipated impeachment, only half of Americans expected it to occur; the rest still foresaw some lesser punishment.

The public did, however, want to see some punishment for the President. Fifty-four percent said Congress should censure Clinton for his actions, an option that the Republican leaders have refused to permit the House to vote on.

One measure of the opposition to impeachment was that even Republicans were divided over it, with 76 percent of self-described conservative Republicans favoring, while all other Republicans were split, 49 percent in favor and 41 percent against.

Other polls have shown higher support for the President to resign if, in fact, he is impeached by the House. But because a minority of the public still confuses impeachment by the House with removal by the Senate, the Times/CBS News Poll pointed out the difference as part of the resignation question: "If the full House votes to send impeachment articles to the Senate for a trial, then do you think it would be better for the country if Bill Clinton resigned from office, or not?" Forty-three percent said better, 53 percent disagreed.




To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22502)12/19/1998 4:28:00 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
I'd advise him to be there. But having become the punching bag he'd become, it's understandable that he doesn't want to detract from the point of his pals proceedings-