SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (22527)12/19/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: lorrie coey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
We will take our revenge prior to 2000. I agree with all you say here, but I think the "Livingston Sacrafice" was part of this orchestrated effort...enter DeLay.
TEXAS CONSERVATIVE...need I say more?

To the President...STAND YOUR GROUND...YOU HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE UNREPRESENTED MAJORITY...

Livingston was gonna leave anyway...DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS TACTIC.



To: Machaon who wrote (22527)12/19/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>Your pal Livingston just resigned from Speaker and from the House!

Great news! Now Clinton will be forced out.

The Republicans will be known as the party that saved our Constitution, our democracy, as we know it.

A message to Clinton from the corrupt: Hang in there and fight these fair and these proven impeachment charges. The thinking people don't support you, but who cares! You will destroy what is left of the Democrat Party.



To: Machaon who wrote (22527)12/19/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
re: if we ever had a woman President, and she lied, under oath, about her age, she could be impeached.

You're still missing the point. The issue is not what the lie is about! If ANY president were to lie under oath about ANYTHING, then s/he would have clearly demonstrated, by her/his obvious disregard for the rule of law, that s/he was unfit to hold the highest office in the country and MUST be impeached. We cannot allow our leaders to break laws with impunity. That path leads to repression and tyranny.



To: Machaon who wrote (22527)12/19/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Whatever message Livingston wanted to send, I don't care. Probably the RR booted him out. Why should we care about thieves falling out among themselves????

As for President Clinton, if he resigns, he will in effect be converting this Presidential system of governance into a Parliamentary one, wherein a simple majority of legislators can take him out on a vote of no-confidence. We might end up seeing Presidents lasting in power for a few weeks only to be kicked out by Congress, to be replaced by another, followed by another and another and another...

That shouldn't happen. Definitely not! President Clinton is the only person who can stand between us and that scenario...