SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sawtooth who wrote (20151)12/20/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 
Everen>
Stocks chosen from the analysts' coverage lists by the
Investment Policy Committee as the most timely investments for
each stated purpose.




12/11/98

Rating
Suitability
$ Price




America Online
1-1
H
91.563
American Home Products, Inc.
1-1
L
52.938
Ascend Communications *
1-1
H
60.188
Cabot Oil & Gas
1-1
M
15.000
ChampionshipAuto Racing Teams
1-1
H
28.688
Coast Dental Services, Inc.*
1-1
H
11.688
Comerica, Inc.
1-1
L
65.875
Exodus Communications *
1-1
H
49.875
Family Golf Centers, Inc.*(U)
1-1
H
17.688
G & K Services, Inc. *
1-1
M
51.000
Imax Inc.*
1-1
H
28.563
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (u)
1-1
M
4.813
Labor Ready
1-1
H
20.813
Merck, Inc.
1-1
L
145.563
Old Kent Financial
1-1
M
40.875
Oracle *
1-1
L
37.250
Qualcomm *
1-1
H
52.188
3Com Corp. *
1-1
M
43.813
USWeb *
1-1
H
21.563
Warner Lambert
1-1
L
75.750

A = Actual; E = Estimate; N.A. = Not Available; N.M. = Not
meaningful. Opinion code for intermediate-and long-term time
horizons. 1 = Outperformer; 2 = Market Performer; 3 =
Underperformer.

Suitability H = High Risk; M = Medium Risk; L = Low risk; I =
Income

*EVEREN makes a market in these shares and may deal as a
principal.

(u)EVEREN has acted in an underwriting and/or investment
banking capacity for this company within the past three years.



To: Sawtooth who wrote (20151)12/20/1998 7:22:00 PM
From: CDMQ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Finally, the reports are turning positive. Analysts are beginning to catch on to the propaganda. The tide is turning?
uniontribune.com
Consortium may ease Qualcomm, Ericsson dispute

By Mike Drummond
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

December 19, 1998

SAN DIEGO -- European and Asian telecommunications companies declared yesterday they would "build a bridge" between wireless technologies developed by San Diego-based Qualcomm and its Swedish rival, Ericsson. The move could ease uncertainty surrounding the development and deployment of new and larger capacity wireless systems, known in the industry as third generation, or 3G, a frontier worth billions of dollars. The consortium of companies, which includes Japan's NTT Mobile Communications Networks and British Telecommunications plc, agreed to discuss altering their operating systems to accommodate a convergence of Qualcomm's and Ericsson's latest technologies -- which are currently incompatible. "The ideal is to establish a worldwide . . . communications platform based on a single technical standard," the companies said in a joint statement.

Qualcomm's code division multiple access technology, or CDMA, was first to market and is deployed widely in the United States and Korea. Ericsson's technology is based on global system for mobile communications or GSM, and is being deployed in Asian and European markets. Qualcommm has argued for a convergence of the two rivaling technologies so that its existing technology would be compatible with Ericsson's latest offerings. Ericsson recently proposed a compromise some analysts described as disingenuous.

"We think it's significant that a group of international companies publicly embrace convergence," said Bill Bold, Qualcomm's vice president of government affairs. Others did not think the announcement was all that earth-shaking. "There wasn't a whole lot there," said Pete Peterson, an analyst with San Francisco-based Volpe Brown Whelen and Co. "We were wondering whether there was something coming out later." Ericsson representatives could not be reached for comment. The two companies have been in dispute since 1995, when Ericsson asserted eight patent-infringement complaints against various elements of Qualcomm's digital-wireless equipment. In October, Ericsson dropped five of its eight claims, a retreat many saw as a boost to Qualcomm. The case is scheduled to go to court next year.
"I think the tide is turning against Ericsson," Peterson said. Moreover, Peterson said the lawsuit has compelled the two companies to talk about other mutual issues, which may lead to compromise. "There is direct . . . communication ongoing," Peterson said. "The lawsuit forces the communication between the two, and they have used the forced path to at least exchange ideas on other things."