Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (23408)	12/20/1998 11:48:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

In regards to your bet, sorry but you lose. I have been holding Microsoft, Intel, Cisco, Merk and JNJ for many years. The two macrotrends of our time are riding us on a train to wealth and prosperity. I noticed you didn't attempt to answer the questions contained in that post. I don't blame you, there really is no answer for the simple question of why? Why allow our laws to be bend, obfuscated and twisted by this one person, when Al Gore will be a decent President? Michael

To: TigerPaw who wrote (23408)	12/21/1998 12:07:00 AM
From: aknahow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

As the First Lady indicated early on the charges against Clinton will not be proven. The efforts to obtain a job for Monica could be seen by a few, that wish to stretch a point, as bribery, but since Monica has, under oath, denied that it was tit for that, it will be impossible to prove. No bribery, no conviction. The public does not care what he did. The law is still important and if there is no ability to prove guilt, Clinton is not, under the law, guilty. How can anyone that believes in the rule of law rather than the rule of men disagree with this fact?