Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rose Rose who wrote (292)	12/21/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2390

Who cares about his sex life excepting for the fine example he sets for America, particularly our youth. I personally believe anyone who aspires to the highest office in our land should take their oath seriously and strive to operate in a manner that will set a good example for our people. I just bumfuzzled that you and a lot of people like you completely ignore that he lied under oath and that he attempted to obstruct justice. Your mantra seems to be that it is his personal sex life and none of anyones business. That's not the main issue. In about 12 years you might just be thrilled to death to have your daughter accepted as an intern in the white house. Shouldn't you be able to have confidence that a very high ranking 50 year old won't be attempting to seduce her?

To: Rose Rose who wrote (292)	12/21/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Bald Man from Mars	Respond to of 2390

Not if he lied to me in front of the camera ... He can choose to say nothing or admits he should not do it ...

To: Rose Rose who wrote (292)	12/21/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: steve kammerer	Respond to of 2390

Rose, I'm not saying that his sexual life is my business, I'm saying that libeling a person (Jones), is. Using the entire government to atack a single person is. Blocking that person from tying to get redress in courst is. It was NOT a small thing. In fact Clinton paid $750,000. Using the OJ Clinton defense of attacking the investigator. In fact that's the same thing Saddam Hussein is doing. The two have a lot in common concerning the structure of their arguments.