Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : MB TRADING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (2933)	12/21/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: Jazzy Jeff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7382

My initial funds hit my account this morning and I finally began trading.... My account is now 32% higher than it was this morning. ;) Great day! MB kicks ass. Datek can rot in hell. -jeff

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (2933)	12/21/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: SteveDavis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7382

All, I have two questions? Is there not a definitive period of time (20 days) before you are allowed to "short" an IPO? Is there also not a period of time (quite period) during which the analyst can not write an opinion on an IPO? I was told these are SEC rules and I would appreciate some feedback if anyone knows the actual facts. Thanks, Steve Davis

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (2933)	12/27/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: scanshift	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7382

Did you come up with any answers to Tom Pope's two minute ARCA market order? His post describing his experience was post #2832. Kimberly I see during the last week that there was not much action on the MB Trading thread. Did you come up with any answers to the questions that I had in my post 2930, pasted below: To: Kimberly Lee (2893 ) From: scanshift Monday, Dec 21 1998 2:33AM ET Reply # of 2944 "It is this kind of facts and trails of unassailable evidence that shred malicious slanders into pieces." by Kimberly Lee, post 2893 Kimberly, for someone with your trading experience I am surprised that you did not look more carefully at Putnam's detailed explanation as did some other traders before you made your post. Also I do not know why you consider his post unassailable evidence? These points were brought to my attention: 1. Why were the first two attempts made to market makers, when apparently the Island ECN was consistently there with the market makers when each initial attempt to market maker 1 and market maker 2 was made? 2. The 7/8th fill at Redi should not have been a surprise because the stock than printed 25. One question, is why was the limit ever raised? Why did it not stay at 3/4 where it was at the last market maker? Didn't Island still have size at 3/4? 3. Arca has a major flaw if on "three" different occasions it cannot fill against Island. Statistically that is very strange. Also, less than a 1 second turn around time for each Island attempt? Are you sure that Arca generated a realistic limit price for each of its Island attempts (i.e. was not off 1/16th or 1/8th). This brings up the question of competition. As I stated in prior posts, it is not in the best interests of the principals of ARCA to have the #1 ECN, Island, ranked by November volume to Nasdaqtrader.com to do their business. How can Putnam and Townsend be principals of the Archipelago/Terra Nova ECN and then be principals in an ARCA order system that is going to be "impartial" to where trades are directed? 4. You seem to be well informed. Is Southwest having problems as a clearing firm. This newsgroup was brought to my attention, one that I had not seen before. Most of the focus is on MBTrading's problems with Southwest. elitetrader.com. I truly appreciate everyone's private posts and am grateful for your support. I was interested in watching Globex S&P 500 action at this time of the night given the impeachment, day after a triple witching, and end of the war, but so far tonight it was a minimal range.