SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Herb Blair who wrote (6153)12/21/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: Greg Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
To All: Here's a few new tidbits from today's filings. [My comments bracketed]

1. Castle Creek got 447,761 additional warrants along with the series B preferred, but they also agreed to trade in their original 447,761 warrants for the same number of new warrants at $6.7838 per share. Bad news: 0.5 million more warrants toward dilution. Good news: warrants have higher share price than before.

2. "We have delivered the first automated assembly lines to the Northern Ireland facility. . . . We expect this line to complete safety testing in the first quarter of calendar 1999 but there is a risk as to the timing or even the success of this safety-testing process. Upon successful safety testing of the lines, we expect to send product samples to potential customers for evaluation."
[So I guess previous customer samples were indeed sent out from Nevada.]

3. "From our discussions with potential customers, we expect that customers will require an extensive qualification period once the customer receives its first commercial product off a production line. To date, we have not provided any such commercial product to any potential customer, and therefore, have not started any product qualification period." [The extension of floorless variable conversion to July 27 is indeed a good thing.]

4. "In September 1998, Klockner Bartelt/Medipak, Inc. d/b/a/ Klockner Medipak filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (File No. 98-1844-Civ-7-24E) alleging breach of contract by us with respect to an agreement for the supply of battery manufacturing equipment, and claims damages of approximately $2,500,000. Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses to this suit, if it is resolved unfavorably to us it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition."
[Hope Lev doesn't need any fine-tuning done to the machine!]

5. "In June 1998, we filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County, against L&I Research, Inc., Powell Electrical Manufacturing Company and others seeking relief based on rescission and damages for breach of a contract. In September 1998, Powell filed a cross-complaint against us and others (File No. CV 7745534) claiming damages of approximately $900,000."
[Does anyone know anything about these two companies?]