Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jdcpa who wrote (21032)	12/22/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: jdcpa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Quote.com shows the last trade at 7.8 cents for 20,000 shares. That would be quite a Christmas present.

To: jdcpa who wrote (21032)	12/22/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Jgilbert	Respond to of 43774

Every six month old company has potential, and usually not much else. It's the company's handling of facts that bothers me-not enough to sell, but enough to stop buying until something jells. I have not posted nor do I intend to post my expectations for this stock, if I have any. Those in the know are never identified, but I hope he/she is right. I'll be around when whatever happens happens. Best wishes for a happy Xmas.

To: jdcpa who wrote (21032)	12/22/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Someone in the know feels the intrinsic value is 20 cents per share currently, disregarding deals in progress. Well there's an interesting statement. Let's examine that. If the intrinsic value is truly at 20¢'s a share, and we know that the management at PRWT thinks this is really the case, then why are they so generous? Why do they talk up this stock with investors at every opportunity? Why do we have Merv in Las Vegas and Charlie and John in New York shooting off their mouths about the shareholders being rewarded? Seems to me if this was such a sure thing, and they are as well capitalized as they say, with the current price at 1.7¢'s and the float at 200 to 230M shares, we are talking about only $3½ million to buy up the float. So why aren't they buying for $3&#189 million, what is worth intrinsically over $40million? This does not compute. Is it really philanthropy? Have they really decided that they want to reward all of the long enduring shareholders? Are there really Santa's helpers named John, Merv, Gus, and Charlie? Often when something is too good to be true . . .