SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Orbital Engine (OE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John M Connolly who wrote (3633)12/22/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Maverick  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4908
 
Roberta Salings SUGGESTED to me

that the investors on the internet, which she defined as approximately thirty people, aren't representative of OE's stockholders. Don't misunderstand my words, because I don't want to misquote her. She chose words carefully. She indicated thirty wasn't that many people relative to how many stockholders there are. We did not get into how many that is, nor did we address how many shares the thirty of us hold compared to those outstanding. She contended that our opinion is not representative, and I feel she was suggesting our "voice" is insignificant. I did get her to admit that the unrepresentative claim can't really be made because she has no idea how the other shareholders feel if they haven't voiced SUPPORT for the convertible. Lack of a complaint is NOT support. I also contended that a large chunk of the stockholders aren't even aware of it, but if they were they too would be complaining. Finally, we know that a lot of people "lurk" on these thread (I sure as hell don't blame them), and who knows how many people actually Emailed their opinions. I just thought you guys should know this before you get too excited. Again, I am only reading between the lines, but it seemed to me she dislikes having to deal with issues brought up on the internet (presumably because it immediately spreads thru a lot of investors, many who call). The internet has changed investing FOREVER. May as well get used to it. It's going to be a lot harder to hide sneeky moves and mistakes from stockholders. But we've essentially been labeled as troublemakers. Except for maybe Pierre the Boy Scout. It would be a lot more fun to be popular, but not if I'm going to lose money doing it!

Did anyone even notice that I indicated JH made an important post regarding CMGI? I call 'em as I see 'em, GOOD and bad.

Siemens+Mercury+Bombardier+Tohatsu+Lotus+Sundiro+Aprilia+Texmaco-BHP-RGC-RS=$3



To: John M Connolly who wrote (3633)12/23/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: PIERRE HANDL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4908
 
Email me your name and the number of shares to phandl@aol.com. I will collect the information and present it to Ms. Saling. Those who wish a copy of the tally I'll email them a copy without names. I guess this could represent a show of solidarity.



To: John M Connolly who wrote (3633)12/23/1998 6:47:00 PM
From: PIERRE HANDL  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 4908
 
24 people responded so far

# of Shares Broker

5,100 Price Waterhouse, SF
5,000 Charles Schwab, SF
25,000 Merrill Lynch
4,300 Merrill Lynch
4,700 Vanguard
1,000 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
107,000 Merrill, A. G. Edwards, Swchwab, Century Investment Group
4,000 Waterhouse
1,500 ?
2,000 ?
23,000 ?
6,000 Datek, Suretrade, Scottsdale
2,000 ?
12,000 ?
8,000 ?
1,000 Olde Discount Brokerage
10,750 ?
6,500 ?
Total: 228,850