Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (20287)	12/22/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: Dave	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

SKIP PAUL: If QCOM refused to licence it's IPR for WCDMA what are the viable choices for ERICY: 1. Work around QCOM's IPR. which could take years to develop if at all. Well, as was discussed on this thread, if Qualcomm's patents are, indeed, blocking patents, then Ericsson stands no chance in "working around" Qualcomm's patents. However, I disagree, and you are implicitly stating that Qualcomm's patents are not, in fact, blocking patents. Next point, it wouldn't take Ericsson years of R&D to develop "work around" solutions. All it would take would be a team of attorneys with some of their top R&D people a few months, if not weeks, to find the holes and file at either the US PTO or EPO. One more point to add for your case, there is a big difference in adding a feature to an existing patent and adding a patentable feature to receive a patent. However, when receiving a patent, it is luck of the draw b/c the "breadth" of coverage really depends on the examiner, i.e. the person working at one of those Patent Offices. Get my drift? 2. Start selling WCDMA without a license from QCOM and take a chance in the courts. This could expose it to huge risks. If Qualcomm does indeed have the IPR, yes this is a huge risk, but not just for Ericsson, but for any provider. I do not see any provider, such as AT&T Wireless, offering W-CDMA without some sort of guarantee from Ericsson. Nevertheless, I do agree with you that if Qualcomm has the IPR and Ericsson sells its W-CDMA equipment, infrastructure, etc to Wireless providers (of course where Qualcomm has the coverage for their IP), Ericsson is going to find themselves in a Patent Infringement suit. Furthermore, if Qualcomm provides their case (of course before a fair and unbiased judge and/or jury), Ericsson might be put out of business. Remember, Kodak rendered Polaroid bankrupt after Kodak's victory in a Patent dispute. 3. Become a CDMAone and CDMA2000 licensee and compete with other licensees way behind Nokia. Always the third option. Maybe Ericsson could offer another "fig leaf" ala the rate reduction to Qualcomm. dave

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (20287)	12/22/1998 9:03:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

From DDI website: The site has a series of frames describing CDMAone which can be viewed by clicking on Next. ddi.co.jp DDI and IDO Set to Introduce CDMA In March 1997, DDI Corp. and IDO Corp. announced that they planned to jointly introduce a code division multiple access (CDMA) digital cellular system nationwide. It is the latest digital cellular technology and is gaining wide acceptance throughout the world, as the communications environment becomes increasingly globalized and seamless in terms of technology, systems and businesses. In addition to providing voice communications, cellular phones using state-of-the-art systems technology will act as sophisticated information terminals, transmitting and receiving multimedia information and images. The new service will initially provide 14.4kbps data communications transmission speed, and 64 kbps data transmission speed will be added in 1999. In line with its philosophy of promoting global standardization and the development of a communications environment which allows people to communicate anywhere, anytime, with anyone, DDI views the introduction of state-of-the-art CDMA technology as the next step in increasing customer convenience, service and mobility in an advanced digital format, while remaining compatible with the analog systems in current use. EMeeting User Demand The Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications forecasts that the number of subscribers to cellular systems will increase to about 45 million by the spring of 2001. New users are putting growing pressure on the current spectrum, and the TACS and PDC systems have nearly reached their capacity limits, so there is a pressing need to effect improvements to support increased user traffic through the introduction of high-speed services which make the most effective use of the new 1.25 MHz bandwidth. Otherwise, it will become impossible to handle the onslaught of new subscribers expected around 1998 in cities such as Tokyo and Osaka. This is why DDI and IDO are moving rapidly to introduce the CDMA digital cellular system and services. DDI will be the first company in Japan to introduce cdmaOneTM, in July of 1998 in Kansai, Kyushu and Okinawa, while IDO will start cdmaOneTM services in the spring of 1999. ENumerous Advantages with CDMA Technology CDMA is a modulation and multiple access scheme based on spread spectrum communications technology. In addition to solving the immediate capacity concerns of the rapidly growing cellular market, it also answers industry's long-term need for affordable, efficient mobile communications systems and services. Compared to FDMA and TDMA technology, CDMA features more spectrum-efficient, economical, quality mobile digital cellular capabilities.