SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (24164)12/23/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: pezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Oh, what Bull. I never blamed Bush Just pointed out that it was your boys idea so even the Republicans thought it was a good idea. Even as it sits today most Republicans on this thread and else where support the policy but not Clinton. I see it just the opposite the policy has been tried long enough. Surely it had to be tried more than a year from a realistic point of view.Bush's standing has nothing to do with success or failure. The policy simply underestimated Saddam. He's still here and doing bad stuff.
pez



To: Ish who wrote (24164)12/23/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: lorrie coey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I think that this policy IS still in effect due , in part, to the Bush Dynasty's Oil Interests...Bush always said that to eliminate sadman "wouldn't be prudent...destabalize the region, notgandoit!"

I can see that. I know George & Sons are happy with this current policy...it's obviously been quite lucrative for the Dynasty, so far!

As we say down in Tejas, "If it ain't broke...."

Achtung.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News