SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brady B. who wrote (17276)12/27/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: aleta  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
Brady,

I like your new questions. I think they are fair and complete.

My questions aren't really necessary. I had asked them more out of curiosity and completing the questions I had originally posed to Hayton when I interviewed him on the telephone. Some of you had wondered why he didn't to name some of the successful businesses he claimed to have helped get off the ground when we spoke, so I was simply using this opportunity to follow through on something I should have done before.

The ethics of the people running this company aren't that important to me as a short term investor. As long as they want to pump and dump, I can take advantage of that to daytrade. I, however, won't invest long term since I think this isn't an honestly run company. To state the obvious, I'm not alone in that thought. If I were, this stock would be trading at much higher prices.

Happy New Year and good investing,

Aleta



To: Brady B. who wrote (17276)12/27/1998 11:12:00 AM
From: Brady B.  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 18444
 
These questions are good solid questions that deserve good solid answers. They are questions that can be easily answered and also ones that a company desiring good Investor relations would love to answer.

As far as wanting names and addresses for each question, forget it. Do you really think anyone here is that stupid. They are solid questions. Ones that come up everyday. Why would you need names attached to them? They are questions put together by a group and for a group.

They will be submitted. If they are not answered investors will have to make their own guesses as to why they weren't answered.

I am sure, as RDPBMW on Yahoo said, the existence of these questions is known by ZULU/ESVS management. They have already read them. They will be submitted regardless (by PT or other).

Again, there are no leading questions nor are there any defamatory questions. Just inquisitive questions expected of someone investing in any company. Since they were submitted as a group, names are unnecessary. If anyone thinks that names are necessary, they need to explain their reasoning.

You don't refuse to answer a question simply because you don't like someone.

bb



To: Brady B. who wrote (17276)12/27/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 18444
 
Brady, I think you've done an excellent job on the questions. I liked also that you categorized them respectively. My only concern is that there are too many questions. I think you're right on target. Recommend another look to try and consolidate into fewer questions.