SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 8:46:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Crude prices rise Iraq opposes U.N. extension

By BLOOMBERG

NEW YORK -- It wasn't U.S. cruise missiles that sent oil prices
higher yesterday, but again Iraq was front and centre.

Crude oil rose 2% after Iraq said it would oppose extending the
U.N. program that enables it to sell oil to buy food and medicine,
which ends in May.

The U.N. program is an exception to economic sanctions
--including an oil embargo -- imposed on Iraq after its invasion of
Kuwait in 1990.

Without the accord, Iraq -- a major player in the world's daily oil
supply -- would be prohibited from shipping any oil amid a global
supply glut that's dropped oil prices by 35% in the last year.

"Prices would go back up because it would remove a good
chunk of oil from the market every day," said Abe Glass, a trader
at Spear, Leeds & Kellogg in New York.

Still, ending the oil-for-food accord would "put a lot of pressure
on the U.N. to end sanctions" altogether, he said.

Crude oil for February delivery rose 23 cents to $11.46 US a
barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

West Texas Intermediate spot price also rose yesterday to close
at $11.45 US, up 42 cents.

Iraq exports about 1.8 million barrels of oil a day, or about 2.5%
of world consumption, under the current phase of the U.N.
program.

In confirming Baghdad's intention to reject any extension of the
oil-for-food program, an oil ministry spokesman said Iraq
"demands the immediate lifting" of the sanctions.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 8:57:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Gas Firm Sues Province

Monday, December 28, 1998

HALIFAX -- TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. wants Nova Scotia to cough up millions of dollars for allegedly reneging on a gas-pipeline agreement struck with the provincial government in 1983.

In a lawsuit wending its way through the courts, TransCanada says the province failed to honour a memorandum of agreement to "co-operate in the design, construction, ownership and operation of an economically viable regional gas pipeline system."

TransCanada's lawsuit against the province, and its oil and gas company -- Nova Scotia Resources Ltd., or NSRL -- claims $18-million in costs, plus interest and loss of potential profits. CP




To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 9:14:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Kuwait Warns Of Oil Drop To $5, Vows Action

Kuwait warned Monday that world oil prices could drop to $5 a barrel in the absence of action by producers and said OPEC could hold an emergency meeting to tackle historically-low prices ahead of its scheduled March conference.

Oil Minister Sheikh Saud Nasser al-Sabah told a two-hour news conference that OPEC could meet in February after Venezuela's new government assumes power, facilitating collective decisions.

"There could be a (positive) change in Venezuela's stand in the next meeting God willing," he added.

At OPEC's last meeting in November, heavyweight Saudi Arabia accused Iran and Venezuela of going back on supply cuts agreed earlier this year.

OPEC "could meet ahead of March because the situation cannot continue like this," said Sheikh Saud. "Prices should reach their peak during the (current) winter months, so imagine what they will be like in the spring and summer if they are at this level (of around $10 a barrel for Brent) now."

Sheikh Saud said his country was ready to attend an emergency OPEC meeting "and I believe that other members are also prepared to attend. February is appropriate after Venezuela's new government" assumes power.

The minister blamed the current slump in world oil prices on an excess supply of three million barrel per day "which could be easily cut" by OPEC and non-OPEC states.

"In meetings this year we cut more than three million bpd so it can be easily done if there is readiness" by producers, he added, stressing that it should be a matter of "price not quantity."

When asked if Kuwait would launch a new intiative to rally support for further production cuts similar to efforts in September when it hosted a series of oil ministerial talks, Sheikh Saud said:

"No, no, no, we will not surrender to the status quo because it has become an issue of destiny and a very important issue. After (the Moslem fasting month of) Ramadan (in late January) we will look into this issue..."

Kuwait, which controls slightly less than 10 percent of proven world oil reserves, has been a strong advocate for a third round of oil cuts this year. After two cuts this year of a total of 225,000 bpd, Kuwait's production is currently at 1.98 million bpd.

Sheikh Saud said: "I fear that matters go out of hand and that every country thinks it is not obliged to implement (cut) pledges and we go for additional cuts and then see the barrel price under $5. The issue now requires wisdom.

"We still have excess supply of three million bpd and it must be withdrawn by OPEC and non-OPEC states," he added.

"There must be cooperation" between all producers.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 12:28:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Little Upside Seen For Struggling Oil Producers

Cash Crunch: Survival For Many May Hinge On Crude Price Recovery

By Claudia Cattaneo
The Financial Post

Making a call on the fortunes of Canada's oil and gas industry in 1999 is like trying to predict Saddam Hussein's next move.

Circumstances are tough and unsettling -- to the point even the bravest see little upside until oil prices recover.

For many firms, the challenge will be survival, let alone performance, industry observers agree.

West Texas Intermediate crude oil closed at $11.33 a barrel yesterday in New York, about 40% lower than before the commodity started going downhill about 14 months ago because of oversupply and lower world demand.

The collapse shaved 45% off the Toronto Stock Exchange oil & gas subindex since its October, 1997, high, shutting down access to cash and investor interest.

"The key is to have some strength come back to oil prices, getting equity back into the sector so that the drilling can come back," said Tom Ebbern, oil and gas analyst in Calgary with Newcrest Capital Inc.

Natural gas, so far the sector's better half because of the commodity's rosy long-term outlook, is also beginning lose its appeal. With so little cash available for drilling and high storage levels because of the relatively warm winter so far, many natural gas programs are beginning to fall, says Martin Molyneaux, research director at FirstEnergy Capital Corp. in Calgary.

"The shift to natural gas is constrained by opportunity and financial capacity," agrees ARC Financial Corp., a Calgary based energy research and investment firm.

ARC says gas drilling is expected to increase only marginally next year, to about 5,000 wells, up from 4,800 in 1998 -- hardly enough for producers to take advantage of increased pipeline capacity to U.S. markets or to make up for the low oil prices.

Oil drilling has collapsed. ARC says only 3,700 oil wells were drilled in 1998, and 2,500 are projected for next year, down from 8,500 oil wells in 1997.

Meanwhile, increased debt levels, the probable devaluation of oil assets at the end of the year, the prospect of further declines in earnings and cash flow could result in industry credit concerns in 1999, the Dominion Bond Rating Service Ltd. warns in a recent industry study.

Not surprisingly, capital spending -- a key indication of future industry activity and health -- is off sharply, as companies shift their focus to managing their cash, rather than their budgets, said Mr. Molyneaux.

Based on a survey of industry spending plans, ARC estimates capital spending in the sector will be cut a further 6% in 1999 from this year's $13.5-billion, already off from 1997, when the industry spent an unprecedented $18.9-billion.

"Corporate plans for 1999 are extremely fluid and highly dependent on commodity prices, to the point that many companies were reluctant to commit to specific numbers," the firm says.

But Mr. Molyneaux says the micro spending cuts that are containing activity in Canada are also taking place around the world. Eventually, they will lead to a macro oil price recovery.

"With the supply numbers eroding quickly all over the world, but relatively stable demand numbers and some signs of growth out of Asia, we think that by the end of the second quarter you will start to see more balance between supply and demand," he said.

That should result in some uptick in oil prices starting in the second quarter, he said.

Mr. Ebbern is also looking for an oil price recovery by mid-1999, particularly if members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries send strong signals of a supply cut when they meet in March.

Meanwhile, investors willing to ride the storm will find interesting opportunities among the sector's depressed stock prices.

"It's the kind of atmosphere where potentially you can create a ton of value, when oil prices get back on track," said Mr. Molyneaux.

Mr. Ebbern says larger companies are likely to perform best in this environment, because they are less volatile and more liquid. Among the seniors, he likes Alberta Energy Co. because of its large natural gas production -- it is aiming to be the country's largest producer in 1999 -- and a stable of oil-related opportunities that can be brought back if oil prices start to behave. His 12-month target is $48. The stock (AEC/TSE) closed at $33.80 yesterday, up 20c.

Mr. Ebbern is also enthusiastic about smaller companies focused on natural gas. The advantage of picking small is that stocks are probably as cheap as they can get. Among those he likes Genesis Exploration Ltd., on which he has a target price of $9.50 in 12 months. The stock (GEX/TSE) closed at $5.20 yesterday, down 5c.

Mr. Molyneaux favours Suncor Energy Inc. ahead of other integrated oil companies. Most of its production comes from the oilsands in Northern Alberta. The firm has the best earnings, cash flow, and production outlook, he said. Suncor shares (SU/TSE) closed at $44.45, up 40c.

Suncor will benefit from its inclusion in the new S&P/TSE 60 index, says Peters & Co. Ltd. in Calgary. It has the largest weighting among energy stocks with 1.36%, while it had the smallest weighting in the TSE 35 index, at 0.25%.

Stocks in the new index are expected to gain from buying by index funds and added exposure to international institutional investors, throught its inclusion in an international S&P index of stocks.

At current prices, Mr. Molyneaux is upbeat on Talisman Energy Inc. A senior oil producer with international operations, Talisman could stage a remarkable comeback if oil prices recover. He has a $45 target for the stock in 12 months. The shares (TLM/TSE) rose 70c to $26.20.

Another favourite of Mr. Molyneaux' is Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., a natural gas weighted and lower-cost producer. He has a 12-month target of $45. The stock (CNQ/TSE) gained 10c to close at $22.40.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Juniors Flip Assets In Former Soviet Bloc

By Jonathan Crevreau - The Financial Post

Canadian energy juniors are making progress at turning problematic investments in former Soviet Union countries into valued assets.

Black Sea Energy Ltd. of Calgary is giving up half of its share in a large Russian oil project to a Moscow company in exchange for a $10-million (US) note and local connections to help resolve a complex legal battle.

Central Fuel Co. of Moscow, owned by the city government, will acquire a 25% interest in the Tura joint venture, which operates a western Siberian oil field producing 10,000 barrels a day.

Controlled by international financier Robert Friedland, Black Sea is in a court tussle over ownership of Tura, jeopardizing its $45-million (US) investment.

The lawsuit has caused the firm's shares to plummet, prompted a freeze on its Russian spending and forced it to look to other countries such as Peru for exploration and development projects.

Peter Meredith, a Black Sea director, said Central Fuel is an established, reputable player in Russia's domestic energy industry. It owns a Moscow refinery, storage tank terminals and more than 100 retail gasoline outlets.

"We think the deal we're doing enhances the value of the whole project," he said. "Although we have given up 25%, we feel it has enhanced the value of the remaining 25%."

In addidtion to punishing Black Sea, investors have also been skeptical of CanArgo Energy Corp.'s ability to deliver on promises of growth in Georgia, another former communist country. CanArgo's shares fell from $4 in early 1997 to about $1.75 in mid-July, when the company announced a reverse takeover of Fountain Oil Inc.

CanArgo has arranged a convertible loan of $6-million (US) with International Finance Corp., part of the World Bank. The money will be used to drill wells, conduct maintenance operations and install facilities to boost oil production from the Ninotsminda field.

The field now flows about 1,700 barrels of oil a day, a figure CanArgo hopes to raise to 4,500 by the end of 1999, said Michael Binnion, the firm's president and chief financial officer. The project has cost about $12-million (US) to date, with CanArgo carrying 68.5% of the load.

He said the steep decline in oil prices and the sale of stock by investors at a loss because of yearend tax considerations have put pressure on CanArgo's stock, something he hopes the financing deal will help alleviate.

"It's an upstream battle to tell people: 'Yeah, we're in the former Soviet Union, we're an oil company and we're a good company.'"




To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (14540)12/29/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (11) | Respond to of 15196
 
IN THE NEWS / Fearless 1999 Prediction: Stocks Will Go Up...And Down

By The Canadian Press

Well, we told you so.

A year ago, analysts and commentators were more or less unanimous in warning that the double-digit annual gains in Canadian stocks of the previous three years were unlikely to continue through 1998.

The figures bear out, so to speak, those predictions.

The Toronto Stock Exchange 300 composite index, the performance benchmark for Canadian equities, is down about 3.5 per cent from its 1997 close of 6,699.44.

It's the first losing calendar year for the TSE 300 since 1994, though things looked sunnier in April when the index hit its all-time peak of 7,822.25 -- up 17 per cent in less than four months.

After a precipitous summer slide and a brief September upturn, the index fell to 5,336.15 on Oct. 5, its lowest point in two years.

From that low, it has gained more than 20 per cent. In all, the year has given many investors a crash course on the meaning of price volatility.

For 1999, analysts agree that the outlook is for a year of challenge and uncertainty -- again.

Forecasts for Canadian economic growth are around two per cent, down by about half from 1998.

Inflation is expected to remain low, largely because the economic slump encompassing Asia, Russia and South America will continue to depress demand -- notably demand for commodities. This means a significant increase in interest rates is unlikely.

Corporate profit growth is also predicted to be moderate at best -- leaving price-earnings ratios high by historical standards.

Even down from April's giddy high, when the TSE price-earnings ratio hit 35, it would still take more than a quarter of a century for earnings at current levels to cover the price of the average TSE 300 stock.

No one can say with certainty whether the revival since the dark days of October is based on real value.

It may be a sucker rally like the one in 1930, which drew in investors who had money left after October 1929, then trapped them in a plunge that lasted two years, into the vortex of the Great Depression.

If that reference strikes you as unduly alarmist, by all means load your money aboard the latest American Internet-stock rocket.

However, if you are disconcerted by prospects of spreading global recession and political instability -- along with imponderable factors like the millennium computer bug and the inevitable unpredictable -- here are a couple of defensive tips:

**Big, stable, dividend-paying corporations like utilities and consumer-products companies tend to hold up well when the economy turns down.

**Commodity prices won't stay low forever. For patient investors, substantial and well managed resource stocks with beaten-down share prices offer potential for long-term capital gains.