Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13711)	12/31/1998 7:46:00 AM
From: KIPPer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Well now that you made your intentions clear, there is no need for you to bring this again a zillion times;frankly we are bored of your same postings and everyone is; you know that if you keep on posting the same thing again and again you could be reported to SI ? no its not a threat I'm just trying to reason with you here; if you have no intentions of doing your DD or answering the question, then you must stop from posting the same thing again and again coz we dont have time for this nonsense;so we will not expect you to post the same thing again, are we clear here? if you have anything else substantial please do, but give us a break! But in reality if we all look at the enormity of TSIG, over the next 3 years, 57 million shares will be nothing once the institutions will get involved and its just my opinion. Mr DitchDigger, hopefully you will listen to us and not post the same thing you been doing it for months now. thanks so much in advance and happy new year Kip

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13711)	12/31/1998 7:59:00 AM
From: findstock	Respond to of 44908

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13711)	12/31/1998 8:26:00 AM
From: David A. Irvine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Ditchdigger, Usually, I don't give a crap what you write, because you obviously have a very limited knowledge of the stock market based on the fact that you regularly post false and contradicting information. Within the last 12 hours you have proven that you don't know what a stockholder deficit is: <<< Topfuel,please explain why there appears to be a deficit of treasury stock..TIA,DD (are you guys going to chip in a few shares and replace it?<vbg>) >>> I like the "vbg" at the end. You obviously thought you were making a smug comment, but in fact you were demonstrating that you know no knowledge of how to read financial statements. Then, you thought TSIG had 51 million shares outstanding. WRONG! Sure, you underestimated, but you proved that you could tell the difference between the weighted average of outstanding shares, and outstanding shares. Big difference. Lead how to read an SEC document before you start spouting off facts from them. Now, on to some new stuff: << (TSIG,) which is horribly debt laden...>>> Please explain what you mean by "horribly debt laden." Specifically, how much is the company in debt? You claim to know that they have this horrible debt, please let everyone know how much it is.....approximately....to the closest million is fine. Then you said: <<not to mention the numerous pending lawsuits >> Yes, TSIG has several pending lawsuits which need to be handled. Most of these lawsuits were the result of previous management. None of them are earth shattering, IMO. They will be settled, and both parties will move on. It is not uncommon for a company to be sued, rightly or wrongly. Next: <<apparently management thinks they're doing great,considering they OK'd a compensation package to include millions and millions of options >> What is the problem? I would rather TSIG use stock as an incentive rather than cash! Now there is a motivation to get the stock price up. BTW, a lot of the stock that has been set aside for employee benefits has not been issued. Setting aside stock for employee benefits is commonplace. In fact, it is almost required to get top management, like I believe TSIG has, to small companies. Ditchdigger, You have the right to post whatever you want, but I also have the right to let people know that you post false information. If you don't want to be embarrassed anymore, then I suggest you pay more attention to what you put in your posts. -Dave P.S. Don't forget, you have a homework assignment to let everyone know how much debt the company has. Good luck!

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13711)	1/1/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: peacelover	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Ditchdigger, With all due respect, didn't you start nibbling when tsig tsig was .45 per your post to someone else on another thread which was reposted on tsig thread by someone? Did you get out of those positions? Are you probably trying to push the stock down to get a few more shares to average? I like consistency in people's judgement. If you believed and bought at .45, why bother to attack tsig now? You either don't believe in a co and not invest at all or invest in a co and stay put until you see material of significance to drive the stock up, sell and go away. I have no issues with you raising the issues you are. As a free man, you are entitled to your opinions in this wonderful country, but redundancy of same issue will lessen the values of your arguments. Peace and good luck. peacelover

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13711)	1/1/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 44908

Ditchdigger, I didn't want to be the only person on the thread not posting to you, so here's my 2 cents worth. Isn't it interesting what an extraordinary level of logic, syntax, motive, variety, and accuracy is demanded of one who posts unflattering facts? Even facts derived from SEC documents! On the other hand, it seems that a person can post anything in positive messages, regardless of how far-fetched, irrational, pie-in-the-sky, or naïve. Repetition? If it's warm and fuzzy, say it again. Reality lies in a combination of those unflattering financial documents AND the (sometimes unfettered) optimism of thread members. The bottom-line question is this: does TSIG have an executable business plan that will result in a profitability level which will allow the company to overcome its currently negative fundamentals? Ditchdigger, I agree that TSIG a) has 57 million shares outstanding; b) $7.3 million working capital deficit: c) pending lawsuits; and d) convertible debenture placement. But what, in your opinion, is the potential of the Babe Ruth league deal? Do you agree that similar deals are possible and probable? Is it conceivable that TSIG has figured out a way to be the low-cost provider and profitable at the same time? Will TSIG be given an "Internet valuation?" In reference to your mention of the "millions and millions" of options set aside for management, these options will have to be handled very carefully, or they will be worthless. Management has everything to gain by enhancing the stock price. When I think about all the changes in society attributable to the Internet, there are many things in life that are becoming obsolete before our eyes. I offer 3 things that are here to stay: music, promoTionS, and fund-raIsinG. And there's TSIG right there in the middle! Regards, Suzanne