Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13749)	1/1/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: Chuck Rubin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

No you won't get flamed Ditchdigger...because we all know what you are about, using such key antagonistic words as "dilution" in many of your posts and of course now, the ominous "reverse split" word! Have you heard from the Company they plan massive dilution and (its hard for me to spit out..here goes ...AN R.S.!! or are these just your own idle musings??? Why do yo idle muse when there is no word from any Company source that they plan this sort of action. What's your point Ditch??? Chuckr

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13749)	1/1/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: peacelover	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

DD, I hope you are wrong, cause it is scary if what you say comes to fruition. By the way, did you sell those shares that you nibbled @ .45? If you so much believe in what you say, why did you start to nibble? I am not interested in flamming you, but the issues you raise concern me very much, but I am a bit confused as to why you started nibbling when nothing has changed in the status of tsig as per your latest posts. Frankly, I am questioning your motives as it does not make sense to me for one to invest in a co with such feelings of yours towards tsig. peace and good luck. peacelover

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13749)	1/1/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: Martin E. Frankel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Ditchdigger, Well... here we go again!! You keep posting the same repetitive "song" over and over again... and yet you refuse to respond to questions which have been asked of YOU. If anything, you tend to ignore those who respond to you questioning your statements. State your "opinion" on a specific topic once... fine. State it twice... still OK. State it three times... you strike out!! Perhaps that is the reason SI has rules about repetitive posts. If you are a shareholder, then why don't you just call the company and make your inquiry... perhaps directly to the Chairman of the Board? If, in fact (and IMO), you are not a shareholder then your posts on this thread certainly smell of someone with a self-serving agenda. << Do you feel that the sales of CD's/music cards,less 1% of net-to be paid to the original sellers will be adequate enough to make this company profitable? >> Yes!! And if you don't understand why, then perhaps you should pay more attention to the "signature" on your "posts". Instead of digging your own ditch... why don't you try some due diligence? It is becoming only too obvious that you have done no DD on TSIG or you would not be repeatedly "harping" the same song. BTW, the term you used was profitable. Have you looked at Amazon.com and their stock structure in the same detail and their market cap... and their overhead? Don't think so! I found this wonderful little post on another thread and thought it most appropriate to repost here. ******************************************************************** "Very few things we know of are eternal... Life as we experience it on earth is limited, even though the believer embraces the hope of eternal life. But most things, like the year just passed, are brief and impossible to cling to. However, there may be an exception. The more I experience it, the more unending appears to be its nature. It can be subdued, but try as you may it doesn't seem to be something you can exclude from your environment. Push it away, and it comes again, with more predictability than a yoyo on the rebound. Try to exclude it from your hearing and it will slip into almost every conversation. There just seems to be no way to get away from it... at least in this life. Think about it. Doesn't that describe your experience with a negative attitude? Even in Christmas some folks find very little to smile about. Good news is quickly transformed into a grumble. And, a smile grudgingly given is snatched away to be replaced with a frown in the blink of an eye. The "woe is me" syndrome is here to stay. Too many people have fun doing it for any hope of abandonment. It is a way of life for them and an inheritance for their children. Some would say, it endures because you just can't kill a good thing. Others would respond, what a shame for those who cannot make it through a single day, enjoying life." ******************************************************************* Oh and BTW, Ditchdigger... the sale of CD's/MusicCards is not now nor will it be TSIG's only business on the Internet or otherwise. If you were truly doing any DD (due diligence... not ditchdigging) you would already know this though... wouldn't you? And if you truly were interested in TSIG as an investment you would have done far more than just come onto the TSIG thread (which, BTW again, has probably had more solid due diligence done than any other thread I know of) to repeatedly post the same "bashing". No, Ditchdigger, IMHO you underestimate not only TSIG and it's management, but also insult the intelligence level of the members of this thread. IMO, you probably will either ignore this post or read and respond to it selectively... the sign of the professional "basher". Some of the numbers you have posted over and over again are obviously pretty close and are a matter of public record as much to TSIG's credit they are a reporting company. Everyone on the thread is well aware of them. You, on the other hand, quite obviously have no position in TSIG and based upon your spamming of the thread with the same old garbage bashing leave little doubt, IMO, as to your agenda. My feelings regarding TSIG are well known by all on the thread, but I do not break the rules, as you are doing, by constantly putting up the exact same thing in my posts. Yes, I feel very positively about TSIG and it's future, but I have also posted numerous times regarding various things I didn't like. It's called integrity. I have done my DD and continue to do so and have continued to buy TSIG stock and have never sold one share... and more importantly I have put my money where my mouth is. In contrast and based upon your boring repetitive posts, IMO, it would certainly appear that "someone" is putting money in your mouth. Just my opinion, of course, but no rational individual would be continuously posting the same old public information over and over and over again... especially if they are not a shareholder and even more importantly when their posts have been responded to. Best wishes for a Happy New Year. I hope that 1999 is not the year that Ditchdigger digs himself a hole so deep that he buries himself. Marty

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (13749)	1/2/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: Robert B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Ditch, <<Deals cost money,and the company's only access to capitol is through more convertible debt(resulting in even more shareholder dilution)>> I have a few questions. With respect to the Babe Ruth League (consisting of 900,000 members) deal, how exactly will TSIG create revenue? Will TSIG provide the Babe Ruth League with bulk shipments of Musiccards? Will the Babe Ruth league pay TSIG for the Musiccards up front? If so, when will TSIG begin to receive payments from the Babe Ruth League? If Babe Ruth League members sell the Musiccards for $10.99, what % will go to TSIG and what % to the Babe Ruth League? How many Musiccards do you think the 900,000 member Babe Ruth League will buy from TSIG in 1999? What incentives will be offered to Babe Ruth League and its members to sell the Musiccards? Call executives from the Babe Ruth League, TSIG, use some common sense, and then get back to me about whether or not you still believe your earlier statement that I posted above. Do you think TSIG will need to use the additional $7.5 million in financing? How do you think the numbers of TSIG's customers will compare to the number of CDNOW's customers in 1999? Let me know the results of your research. -Rob