SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : American International Industries Inc. OTC BB Symbol EDII -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: Needticker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4814
 
For Those of you that can't get to AOL, I will paste LQQX's posts for you.

Subject: Re: Another Viewpoint
Date: 1/1/99 4:28 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id: <19990101162842.11228.00005358@ng37.aol.com>

jmt via holloway writes:

<< 1) There are in fact 110M shares outstanding, 25M in the float >>

Agreed, but there will be a decrease in shares outstanding with the resolution of the lawsuit filed against ACQUEREN for misrepresentation of value upon theoretical liquidation of assets by 50%. From the financials:
<< The purchase agreement
provided for the issuance of 6,750,000 shares of Common Stock to the two largest shareholders of Acqueren...The Company is seeking actual damages in the amount of not less than $1,100,000, in addition to further relief which it may be entitled to. >>
This means that the shares filed will be adjusted by 50%, 1,000,000 restricted of which have not been issued yet and therefore won't be. ACQUEREN has already approached EDII with an agreement to this settlement, meaning 3,000,000 less shares outstanding.

<< 2) EDII paid 6M shares for the parcel of land from the Dror Trust. There was NO independant valuation done on the transaction. The trust is in the name of Dror's son. >>

The benefits to both parties are obvious. If the share price goes up, the trust benefits. If share price doesn't increase, the trust doesn't. EDII benefits from the guaranteed income from the land. There was nothing shady about this transaction. It is simply a part of laying foundation in the initial stages of a growing concern, and a way of creating another source of cash flow.

<< 3) The company continues to post losses. The 9/30/98 balance sheet does not look healthy. Most assets are in inventory and receivables. This is always a warning sign. >>

He forgot the land. A warning sign only if the company continues to post more and more losses. In this case it is exactly the opposite. The first two quarters incurred losses. The third quarter was profitable. The fourth quarter will be even more so with the inclusion of CRC. Look how far this company has come in less than a year. All of the negative posting on the entire Internet will not hold this company back.

<< 4) There are so many names we all recognize on many stock transactions. Elk international ( controlled by Dror's brother) had options for $2M shares at a price of 2 cents per share, which was exercised (and dumped during the hype) in June. They are then issued an additional 5M shares and 3.5M at 3 cents per share. >>

It's the cost of doing business as you lay groundwork. Nothing is free. There are those who will benefit initially from investing in any reliable company, just as we will holding long. It's the name of the game. From where else will cash materialize? Getting angry because someone made a profit on a penny stock gamble, no matter who they are, is to point fingers at the entire market system. The point to consider is whether or
not EDII will continue to grow and turn a profit as a result. I think yes.

<< There is too much in Item 7 to absorb. But I do believe Mr. Dror has been using shares as currency to develop longlasting friendships. >>

Not too much for me. And no, Daniel has been using shares to continue to build a small conglomerate, soon to be larger. I was watching an analyst on CNBC, talking about GE. He said if you only owned one stock in your mutual fund, why not GE? It is essentially a holding company. It controls 18 businesses, including drilling and finance, and trades at a P/E of 38 or 40. Daniel says he has yet to announce closing on UNLIMITED, and
has as many as seven letters of intent to announce short term. EDII isn't GE, but it also costs a hell of a lot less --- right now. The price reflects yearend selloff for tax purposes, and of course some disgruntled owners. But it also reflects almost as much buying and some scalping. It does not reflect the company buyback that will take effect as early as Monday. There are 10 to 15 million shares in the real float,
as there are about 10% that do not move and considered non-liquid, from the list of shareholders that EDII has.

<< What a piece of shit. To you bobby, ruskin, stylewriter and anyone else who assisted in attemting to inflate the stock price while related parties could profit at the expense of small shareholders. >>

Indicates a very impartial viewpoint from what has to be a non-shareholder. It makes me wonder about the agenda. There are those who would pump stocks, just to sell all at an increase, just as there are those who short and slam. I'm content to hold and see what transpires long term. I've said it before and will say it again. Don't let a stock wear out it's welcome in your portfolio. It weighs too heavily on your psyche, and simply isn't
worth it. There are other stocks you can move to. But financials are out on EDII, and you know what you're dealing with now. If you can read a balance sheet, you can see the positive direction this company is headed. In the beginning, do what's right for you in 1999.


LQQX



To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:27:00 AM
From: Needticker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4814
 
Subject: Re: Warning Flag=unaudited
Date: 1/1/99 4:52 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id:

holloway writes:

<< In spite of the fact that EDII ballyhooed the hiring of an auditor, the financial results for the quarter ending September 30 are listed as unaudited. This most likely means that the auditor would not agree with the company figures. >>

Nice twist. Still punching for his nickel a share. It means nothing of the sort. This was an SEC cleared and approved review. Audited financials are not done until year end. Any concerns or questions on this should be directed to:
Jeff Bugenhagen, (713) 659-6551 at BDO Seidman, or EDI company lawyer: Tom Pritchard, (713) 209-2911.
Nice thing about this is that there are now only 90 days left to finish, so the fully audited 1998 financials will be available on time, February 15th, including CRC and the AQUEREN share adjustment.


LQQX



To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:30:00 AM
From: Needticker  Respond to of 4814
 
Subject: Yet Another Viewpoint
Date: 1/1/99 6:15 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id: <19990101181549.11228.00005440@ng37.aol.com>

holloway writes:

<< Well, I will mention one bright spot about EDII. They claim that they had more than 2 million in cash at the end of September. >>

Correction. One more bright spot.

<< On the negative side, they are still losing money and their annual sales are far less than the 110 million that was estimated a few months ago on the company web site.>>

As I stated before, they are losing less and less. EDII's 3rd quarter was profitable. The $110,000,000 projected revenues were projected with INTILE included. From the June 30 press release: << The annualized revenues of the presently owned subsidiaries and the above-described companies to be acquired will approximate $110,000,000 and the company is currently profitable. >>

<< I believe that the stockholder equity is listed at about 2 million dollars or roughly 2 cents per share. >>

Careful holloway. Boldly incorrect, bordering liable. From the SEC cleared financials:

Stockholders Equity
3,488,728 (Dec 97)
11,457,020 (Sep 98)
328% change
or roughly $12,000,000/100,000,000 shares, equals .12 cents a share. This is a conservative estimate, as much of the land "liquidation" value would be much more. For instance, the Dickensen property is listed at $1,800,000 but is worth much more than this, should it become liquid.

<< Since the company does not have earnings, it is not possible to value the stock on that basis, but many companies are selling at about one times sales, so that would suggest that EDII is fairly valued at the current price.>>

...and many companies are selling for much more than this, so your "fair value", incorrectly based from the get-go, appears even more laughable.

<< I don't see any reason to go out and buy the stock, based on what they have released. >>

What a surprise.

<< It is a negative that much of their numbers have not been approved by their auditor even though the auditor was hired for that purpose. Some of the financial info has been audited and quite a lot has not been audited. >>

An SEC approved review of the numbers has been completed, despite your total ignorance of the subject. A review is 99% accurate auditing. Nothing negative about it, unless one considers the source of your statement.

LQQX





To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:31:00 AM
From: Needticker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4814
 
Subject: Re: The loan
Date: 1/1/99 7:41 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id: <19990101194131.11228.00005492@ng37.aol.com>

holloway writes:

<< Here is the quote (from EDII financials): >>

"During fiscal year 1998, the Company advanced Mr. Dror a total of $74,404, and in November1998 Mr. Dror executed a promissory note payable to the Company in the amount of $74,404 payable on demand at prime interest rate."

<< First of all, why did he wait until November to sign a promissory note? Was it because the auditors questioned the transaction? >>

Yes, it was brought to his attention by the accountants, and was told that a promissory note was the best way to handle it. Of course, he intended to dispense with the debt legally and correctly, regardless. It was the result of an expense account that related to non-company expenses. If he flew to Europe on business, for example, and wanted to play a game of tennis at the local club. He would just charge that cost on an EDII card,
along with a rented car, dinner and entertainment. Non-EDII related items would be subtracted from the charges at the end of the year and subtracted from any bonuses or salary considerations. Most companies have this ability, even mine.
Daniel received no salary for most of 1998. From the SEC approved financials:
<< In May 1998, Mr. Dror entered into a three-year employment agreement with the Company which provided for compensation of 100,000 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.12 per share expiring in May 2001. In October 1998, Mr. Dror terminated the employment agreement dated May 1998, and
entered into a new three-year employment agreement with the Company, which provides for a monthly salary of $1,000. The employment agreement provides for a bonus to be determined by the Board of Directors. >>

Daniel quotes Warren Buffet by saying:

"Why would I take a large salary when growing a company, if $100,000 out of company coffers, when multiplied by a P/E of 30, would equate to $3,000,000, and diminish shareholder equity by that much?"

<< Secondly, I wonder if Daniel Dror the CEO of EDII will ever demand repayment from Daniel Dror the borrower? This is an open ended loan that most likely will never be repaid. Would that we could all get terms so sweet! >>

To continue Daniel's quote:

"Should the Board decide to forgive that debt in the form of a bonus at the end of the year as a reward for a job well done, it would be their prerogative to do so."

<< This is only one of a long list of related party transactions that are not in the interest of you shareholders. I would run, not walk, away from this company. >>

Twopac's most elloquent recomendation:

<< START RUNNING FATBOY >>

LOL Everything Daniel has done to this point has been in the best interest of the shareholders, and that concern will continue.
Also Twopac's post, which focuses our attention on one of the most pertinent parts of the financials:

Revenues (For 3rd. Quarter) 625,000 4,606,533 737%

Cash 62,991 2,527,143 4,012%

Working Capital 344,093 2,952,230 858%

Stockholders Equity 3,488,728 11,457,020 328%

Total Assets 4,588,081 19,311,820 421

LQQX



To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: Needticker  Respond to of 4814
 
Subject: Re: Pitts and Spitts
Date: 1/1/99 11:24 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id: <19990101232403.11228.00005635@ng37.aol.com>

Thanks for the followup, Jo.

holloway writes:

<< Therefore the total value of the stock transferred to the Dror Trust in exchange for the mineral rights was approximately $600,000 dollars rather than the 1.5 million dollar present value. Still, it seems that value of the asset may have been substantially less than $600,000. >>

The income generated by the property is $12,000 per month, or $120,000 per year. That the value of that land should have been substantially less is ludicrous. Shop around in that area and see what you come up with when it's land with a gas or oil producing well. I'd say at the time, $600,000 for a guarantee of $120,000 a year, it's a tossup who made the best deal.
The 3rd quarter alone was profitable by $251,000. It wasn't enough to put all 9 months over the top, but it's a start. I couldn't get back to the new site Partes® FreeEDGAR: Free Real-Time SEC EDGAR F... listed on our EDII website American International
Industries, Inc for corroborating evidence, but will try again tomorrow. Maybe someone else can find it before I do.

<< Hey, if you have a good investment, can't you say why it is a good investment? Or would you prefer to say something about "fasten your seat belts, it is getting ready to blast off". >>

I prefer both. Unrestricted. It's the American way.

Colleen via holloway writes:

<< It's definitely been a real learning experience. I had to stay til the first curtain call before I was willing to cast my vote. And now that the fat lady is
singing... >>

Colleen has lost faith in another company many of us own that showed a sharp rise yesterday, (the 31st). EDII's Act One has just begun. I'm listening very carefully, and I hear no Fat Lady. Colleen wished us luck in 1999, and
I return that sincere wish to her, and everyone.

Mitchell via holloway writes:

To: jmt (4260 )
From: Mitchell Vince
Wednesday, Dec 30 1998 6:46PM ET
Reply # of 4302

JMT, thank you for your informative post, and reading of the filings, I'm sure Janice and Wireless Wonk will be getting to them shortly.
Anyway, this company in my opinion is a total scam, Dror had all these special deals set up with the options for the shares, then pumped the puppy and then let his brothers suck the regular investors dry.
BUT DON'T WORRY DANNY BOY AND THE G BROTHERS, THERE HAS BEEN A VERY STRONG RUMOR FLOATING THAT I HEARD FROM MY BROKER THAT EDII IS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR PUMPING AND DUMPING AND SHARE MANIPULATION.
I'll admit I got caught up in this one and only have myself to blame for not doing all my DD, thank god the 50k I lost I have already made back up in BNEZ, are real company with a real product right now at Comp Usa and other computer stores.
Don't worry JMT and Janice and other who all warned us of this penny scam, I'm doing everything in my power and that is quite a bit to make sure that no stone goes unturned into Top Dog, Guttman, Gort, Dror and anybody else that pumped this worthless piece of crap up to over .75 cents when they had all bought in at .10 cents and then printed on the internet false and misleading news.
I HAVE MADE IT MY MISSION IN 1999 TO SEE THE DOWNFALL OF ALL OF THOSE INVOLVED IN THIS PUMPAND DUMP, JUST LIKE WHAT HAPPENEND TO MTEI.
So you boys out there better have your tax and stock records in hand. Because somebody is coming to get them, and you can bet on that. mitchell

LOL I am mighty glad he signed off on those statements. Daniel has seen the faxes. Should you see this, they're sitting and waiting for you, Pal. I was told (no RUMOR), that company and personal lawyers are making it their solemn mission to
locate and identify who you and others are, and will prosecute for libelous remarks and threats made on the Internet. Daniel and others have been gracious long enough. BDO doesn't take their filings lightly, nor does EDII. The cannons are loaded and pointed in SI's direction. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. I guess the New Year fireworks aren't over yet. We'll have ring side seats over here on AOL.



LQQX



To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 8:45:00 AM
From: jmt  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4814
 
Jim:

I am not on AOL. But I would very much like to hear the "explainations" myself. Can you post anything stated about the related party transactions? Or all the shares issued to insiders? Or the preferred shares ready to be issued? Or the land deal without an appraisal?

The wonderful thing about SEC filings is they must be objective. They do not allow for the misinterpretations we have heard here from Kevin1, Mitchell Vince, Ruskin, bobby and others.

Wasn't Richard Altomore good at explainations also? And who is this unnamed LQQX? The same person that said the numbers would be great? Recall there are many more shares on options to be converted and those coming off restrictions that will hit the market, depress the price and increase the float. And there are many more shares authorized and ready to be issued to more insiders. Someone (maybe now on AOL) has to keep up the hype to support the selling. I would welcome LQQX on SI to discuss the filing in detail.

I do not believe EDII is a total scam. I believe it is a strategically managed business with the primary objective of growing insider wealth at the expense of shareholders.

Jim, your loyalty is commendable. IMO you could find many other companies and people more deserving of you loyalty.

And while we may hear something different from the same written words, there have been posters hear with no angle or profit motive, armed with just integrity and facts dug from hours of research. My hat is off to those individuals who recognized many months ago much of what is unfolding today.

jmt



To: Jim K. who wrote (4304)1/2/1999 9:43:00 AM
From: Needticker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4814
 
Subject: Re: Yet Another Viewpoint
Date: 1/2/99 9:14 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: LQQX
Message-id: <19990102091410.27696.00005497@ng40.aol.com>

holloway writes:

<< ...the huge difference between the projected 110 million annual sales and their actual sales cannot be explained by the absence of Intile, as you claim. >>

It's too early to tell whether Daniel overstated annual revenues without INTILE, but focus that razor sharp mind on the fact that the year is not fully reported yet. There is a whole quarter missing, with CRC and UNLIMITED COATINGS to be included, as well as all the revenues from the other EDII companies. And it seems to me that we have to own these companies for a full year, and report results of
those revenues, before we can start claiming that Daniel's estimates were inflated.
From the October 30 press release:

<< Net Income for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 was $251,500 on revenues of $4,606,500. For the nine months then ended a net loss of $125,000 on revenues of $5,781,000 was incurred. This compares to a loss of $606,000 on revenues of $1,876,000 for the
comparable nine month period last year. The significant improvements in the third quarter and for 1998 are a direct result of the success of the Company's acquisitions completed over the past few months. Acqueren, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Northeastern Plastics, Inc. generated revenues of $3,936,000 and income of $320,000 since acquisition on June 30, 1998. The Company's other significant acquisition of Cinema Research Corporation was
completed in late September 1998 and its revenues and profits will be recognized by the Company in the fourth quarter of 1998. >>

From the September 10th CRC acquisition release:

<< The acquired companies projected annual revenues are approximately $10-$12 million and profitable. >>

Keep twisting around the clock, holloway. New year, old hat. Next week should be fun.
LQQX