Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (44573)	1/2/1999 11:11:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571406

Paul - RE: "Remember, Maxwell - the 450 MHz K6-2 will suck just like the 400 MHz K6-2 - BECAUSE THE L2 CACHE WILL STILL BE STUCK AT 100 MHZ WHERE it HAS BEEN STUCK SINCE THE 300 MHz K6-2 was introduced !" Who cares? You and I do, but not the typical consumer. As Jim says, "MHz Sells".

To: Paul Engel who wrote (44573)	1/2/1999 12:01:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571406

Pal, <L2 CACHE WILL STILL BE STUCK AT 100 MHZ> Here we are again, retard. How many times I have to repeat for you that this is above your Homer-grade brains? Don't you remember that it was just recently discussed? That is your Xeons with expensive "450MHz" cache has no performance advantages over the half-speed counterparts? Don't you see that your arguments are equally irrelevant to the performance issues? It sounds like you just do not have any other arguments (because there is really none) to defeat the K6 massive attack.