Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (2321)	1/3/1999 6:32:00 AM
From: rainman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Ron- Your post (#2321)is appreciated. I think there has been frequent posting of false innuendo and/or accusations of fraud that have been throw around too lightly. So lightly that it does rob the thread of credability. Such accusation are serious and the basis for them should be deliniated or further qualified. I sense that too often the basis for such accuasation is tertiary i.e.,negative press reports but they somtimes appear on posts as first-hand information. People do have different perceptions of companies regarding their value and future potential. "Overvalued" and "scam" seem to be frequently conceptualized as synonomous on this thread. Using such terms synonomously is confusing and defeats one of the purposes of this thread i.e., to expose scams. Regardless of ones perception of a company everyone wants to avoid a scam. Using the term "scam" or inferring scam thru innuendo should be reserved and used cautiously to protect all from a scam and should not be used has third-hand information to support ones position.