Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BRAVEHEART who wrote (4770)	1/3/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: Junkyardawg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Brave.... I also have a BB stock that I feel very strongly about. But out of respect to Tim and their thread I do not even mention it. It is the polite thing to do. If someone is not even polite enough to respect a mans wishes then I sure don't want to buy a stock he/she recommends. If you must why not just post something like this. I have a stock I like but it is a BB stock. I must tell you I really like it but out of respect to your thread I only post the url hear for you to look at. www.url.mystock.com Now that would be the polite thing to do. dawg

To: BRAVEHEART who wrote (4770)	1/3/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: JimBeamII	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

BRAVEHEART -- a very thoughtful post and analysis. Nonetheless, in terms of the threads published criteria for posting, the company is 1) a OTC:BB stock; and 2) not a position (80%) or day play (20%). Whereas your post is thorough and, I assume accurate, few people talking about BBs provide such quality information. Therefore, I would hope a strict adherence to the no-BB-stock rule will prevail here. I, for one, am enjoying the quiet deliberation here and would hate to open the door to penny touts -- of which, I would not categorize you based on your post. With all due respect, Prosperous Trading! jb