Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William H Huebl who wrote (35958)	1/3/1999 12:47:00 PM
From: jjs_ynot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 94695

I'm not sure if your question is tongue in cheek, so I will answer it seriously. Pakistan internal rebels probably would not produce a nuclear reaction by Pakistan. If you look at the Nuclear capacity of Pakistan; it seems very limited from what I have read in the news media and more for show than a tactical system. If you look in Jane's "All the World's Missiles" and there are some European websites showing missiles and capability of various nations; India appears more formidable. There appears to be nothing here to provoke India.

To: William H Huebl who wrote (35958)	1/3/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Bill, ME is much more volatile than Pakistan and India.According to Time Magazine, BinLaden admitted to give guidance to destruction of US targets. The shortsigth of the US State Department and Clinton eagerness to be "Presidential" during the Senate proceedings, are much more dangerous to the US than the Pakistany event. Haim