Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Wise who wrote (8828)	1/4/1999 12:39:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 10479

"Does "scam" ring a bell? " A good example of an out and out lie. Do you think that doing that helps? ""The latest 10q shows declining revenues in all divisions". Over what - 1996, again?" Over the previous quarter, and the one before that, and the one before that, yes, revenues have been declining since 1996. "which your people took advantage of " When are you going to accept the fact that I'm an individual and don't have any people? Barb

To: David Wise who wrote (8828)	1/4/1999 6:32:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

David, below is a cut and paste from Osicom's latest 10q. You can see that all divisions except transmission had revenue declines. Not from years ago, from last quarter. You can rail on all you like about my 'dishonesty', but it is you who is either mistaken or dishonest. I'm not sure why you can't accept that I honestly think Osicom is a lousy company. I accept that you think it is a good company. I could rail on about how you are trying to fool people into buying worthless garbage. I could accuse you of being part of a long cartel trying to fool people into buying worthless garbage. But you see I don't want to make a fool of myself by spouting idiodic conspiracy theories. You seem to have mixed up some of the things other folks have said about Osicom with what I've said. It is not reasonable to lump everything together like that. I am not responsible for anything posted except under my name. It's also dishonest of you to cut and paste only part of a sentance so it seems like I said something I did not. But how else would you be able to discredit me? I don't appreciate you're accusations of dishonesty. Everything I post here is my honest opinion of the company. You really are a very rude man to continue with your baseless accusations. But I guess you have to fool yourself somehow into thinking that the company is a good hold. I feel sorry for you. Barb ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998: NET SALES $ 7,204 $ 3,016 $ 3,873 $ 5,860 $19,953 $ (918) $19,035 COST OF SALES 4,000 2,047 2,129 4,834 13,010 (918) 12,092 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GROSS PROFIT $ 3,204 $ 969 $ 1,744 $ 1,026 $ 6,943 $ -- $ 6,943 ================================================================================================================================ GROSS MARGIN 44.5% 32.1% 45.0% 17.5% 34.8% 36.5% ================================================================================================================================ THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1998: NET SALES $ 8,513 $ 3,199 $ 3,389 $ 6,028 $21,129 $ (809) $20,320 COST OF SALES 4,650 1,497 2,213 5,429 13,789 (809) 12,980 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GROSS PROFIT $ 3,863 $ 1,702 $ 1,176 $ 599 $ 7,340 $ -- $ 7,340 ================================================================================================================================ GROSS MARGIN 45.4% 53.2% 34.7% 9.9% 34.7% 36.1% ================================================================================================================================ edgar-online.com