Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (14903)	1/4/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: antibash	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

You're not only stupid, but ignorant. And, as always, contemptible. If he is all of these things you call him, why do spend your whole day posting to him? Lets face it Janice, he is kicking your butt regarding diligence. You're making yourself look stupid again. Now you have resorted to full blown lying! anti

To: Janice Shell who wrote (14903)	1/4/1999 11:21:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

"FIRST you both said there was no motion to compel granted. THEN you said there was no hearing scheduled. NOW you say, apparently, that everybody's gonna have to show up so that AZNT can ask for a continuance." janice dear , there is no motion to compel other then one defined in bs document you post on wellrich's promotional web page of ulrichs. as for hearing dear, didn't you tell us you were scanning the judgement for all to see? did you not tell us all there already was an arbitration hearing & did you not post another wellrich document on ulrichs wellrich web page to promote that hearing? dear since you told this thread already there was a hearing & it resulted in this judgement you have been scanning the past several months, why would wellrich have to go through bother of a motion to compel an arbitration you told us already happened & resulted in a judgement against aznt. don't your trustworthy wellrich documents support your claims any longer? or dear are you telling us that these old documents are no good but this new wellrich document can be trusted? you confuse me dear. you now admit that the judgement you were scanning was actually a lie? what of the documents you posted to promote this lie? are they lies too? are the new claims you have to promote wellrich supposedly accurate this time & 'these' documents honest? dear you posted that this hearing you said was to take place tommorow was "postponed". I always thought dear the lawyers HAD to be present at 'hearings' & request a continuance if they needed more time. but i guess not is penny stock basher court of law dear. have you called landish about his name being on this document dear? lololol ! spider