SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank Griffin who wrote (1236)1/4/1999 7:13:00 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
In order for justice to prevail than fairness must be present.

Newt Gingrich lied under oath about his college course fund raising. The partisan judicial committee let him CHANGE HIS TESTIMONY! They even let him read other testimony to make sure his second statement didn't conflict! This is the same judicial committee that held a Kangaroo Court and impeached Bill Clinton based on the testimony of Ken Starr who was a hearsay witness!!!!!! You call that justice? The Republicans gave Starr a standing ovation.Pretty obviously partisan!

If we're going to make sure the Pres is not above the law......then we should be equally sure he's given his common rites. Most of their"evidence" would be thrown out of court in a "legal" trial.



To: Frank Griffin who wrote (1236)1/4/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Rose Rose  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2390
 
I am really sick of the same tired little absurdisms that you people keep trotting out, such as:

>>My question, how do you think law and order will prevail if you and others endorse obstructing justice and lying under oath?<<

Kindly point to one post -- just ONE -- in which anyone here has endorsed lying under oath and obstructing justice.

ONE.

Rose