Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rose Rose who wrote (1243)	1/5/1999 12:56:00 AM
From: Frank Griffin	Respond to of 2390

Rose, nearly every post you and your peers make give tacit approval to every bit of negative conduct engaged in by Mr. Clinton. Approval isn't simply stating, "I approve." Approval can also be by defending an action as O.K. or meeting your standards, either morally or ethically. Frank

To: Rose Rose who wrote (1243)	1/5/1999 1:09:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2390

>>My question, how do you think law and order will prevail if you and others endorse obstructing justice and lying under oath?<< Kindly point to one post -- just ONE -- in which anyone here has endorsed lying under oath and obstructing justice. Okay, Rose Rose. Gain some credibility here. Post unequivocally your statement that you belive Clinton was WRONG to lie to the American people, as he clearly admitted he did, and that if he committed perjury he was WRONG to do so, and that if he did break the law he should be penalized for it. If you believe that, say so. If you don't say so, don't complain when others interpret your pro-Clinton posts as endorsing and approving his behaviors.