Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (25997)	1/5/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

They really do need to increase your IV drip rate. Current dosage just doesn't cut it. JLA

To: lorrie coey who wrote (25997)	1/5/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I'm puzzled about your persistent "boogieman" reference...>> I'll do my best to clarify. You just went into a whole speel about specific fears and hates you hold to be true and attribute to me personally and to what I believe. You are attaching all of this to a post I submitted to you. That post held no specific content or even inference to what I believe about my religion or beliefs which are different that those of Bill Clinton and obviously your self. If we were debating about what is essentially right and what is wrong you would probably find that we agree in principle, yet we have differing perspectives on the applied right and wrong. I find that regardless of orientation humans generally agree that kindness (in all of its forms) is a good thing and meanness (in all of its forms) is a bad thing. We have different perspectives in which we view the same circumstances so what I see as a bad thing, due to my perspective, you may see as a good thing, due to your perspective. Now in this case Bill and Hillary made vows they chose to make them public and they signed legal paperwork. The combination of those things constitutes the institution of marriage (their circumstance). I merely pointed out the vows carry a particular presumtion, the publicity holds a meaning, and the legal paper work manifests an additional component to their circumstance. You again jump all over me with a half a dozen hateful and off target remarks about what you are presuming my perspective is made up of. Based on what? What your biased and hate filled doctrine has told you to label the 1 billion people sharing this planet with you. If these accusations were central to my beliefs I would definately be defending them, with my last breath. Since they are not, the obvious conclusion is that you are driven by ignorance and fear. This is practically the definition of a bigot. When someone is so unrealistic about something they fear that they let it color every thing they say and do then that fear becomes the boogie man. Of course, all it typically takes to dispell the fear of the boogie man is flipping on the light. You are choosing the dark corners of your fear to form your pespective. Free will allows you to continue if you so choose. Too bad, life is kind of cool in the light.