Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hogger who wrote (15195)	1/6/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

1) Was there an arbitration hearing yesterday between aznt/wellrich/arbitrator? (Source, if allowable) Yes. Sources: several people from WellRich; one other whom I'd rather not name. Spidey himself confirmed the appointed hearing, though he now denies it: exchange2000.com exchange2000.com 2)Who was there? As I understand it: the WellRich attorneys, Mikey, Robert Qualey, and obviously the arbitrator. Eventually Security. Perhaps others. 3)What was result (if any)? No results; the hearing was continued. 4)What is this crap about Mike bringing a camera? (Video/Still/Movie? And if he did, why didn't he get to use it. I've been in a couple of arbitration sessions that were video taped) I should think that an arbitrator, like a judge, has the right to say yes or no to requests to videotape or take stills. I have no further information on this point, but I'm still laughing. 5) Is DTC suing AZNT? (If so, for what?) I have no idea. According to McClean's testimony at the 2 October injunction hearing, the DTC was considering a suit. For what? I don't know. Maybe for being a pain in the ass. 6) Is AZNT suing DTC? (If so, for what?) AZNT isn't precisely suing the DTC. They do, however, wish to have them added to their lawsuit as an official "defendant" so that they'll be obliged to hold to the terms of the injunction issued on 2 October. As was noted at the time, this doesn't make a great deal of sense, if all that's intended is to maintain the status quo. See the transcript of the injunction hearing for details. 7) Did you have a good holiday season? Did Chief Saint Nick (Indian - Irish, of course) bring you lots of goodies, or had you been a bad little girl? (Kidding, of course) It was largely boring. Italians aren't good at Doing Christmas. 8) What were the results and venue of the arbitration hearing you posted about a few months ago? Mikey appeared, made a scene, and stormed out. Initially WellRich thought it had won by default, but that would only have been the case if he'd failed to show up altogether. Attempts to schedule a further hearing failed, and so WellRich sought a Motion to Compel Arbitration. 9) Was the Motion to Compell Arbitration by a Federal Court (posted by Jihad) the requirement of yesterday's arbitration hearing? The motion was granted in the Clark County District Court, case number A394435, Department 13, Docket G. See Magnetic Diary for the relevant document.

To: Hogger who wrote (15195)	1/6/1999 6:48:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

1) Was there an arbitration hearing yesterday between aznt/wellrich/arbitrator? (Source, if allowable) A: no, there was no arbitration hearing yesterday that the aznt lawyers qualey & landish were aware of. the company says they were not present & were never served. where is the reciept of service? can jihad provide that to her associate janice shell? 2)Who was there? A: who knows? i only know who was not there, landish, qualey & sylver 3)What was result (if any)? A:who knows, ask jihad she is spreading this dribble or janice who is promoting these lies. 4)What is this crap about Mike bringing a camera? (Video/Still/Movie? And if he did, why didn't he get to use it. I've been in a couple of arbitration sessions that were video taped) A: sylver wasn't there & was in negotiations with a defendant from the federal case. 5) Is DTC suing AZNT? (If so, for what?) A: don't make me laugh!!! lololol ! 6) Is AZNT suing DTC? (If so, for what?) A: they seek to extend injunction & restraining order to dtc to get stock returned & freeze lifted. i believe it is no longer necessary. 7) Did you have a good holiday season? Did Chief Saint Nick (Indian - Irish, of course) bring you lots of goodies, or had you been a bad little girl? (Kidding, of course) A: santa was very good to the spiderman! 8) What were the results and venue of the arbitration hearing you posted about a few months ago? A: there was no arbitration hearing, that was a claim of wellrich's promoted by janice shell & jeffrey mitchell. this is why wellrich seek to force an arbitration now. they have no legal foot to stand on. notice janice will not tell us what wellrich hopes to get from this arbitration. 9) Was the Motion to Compell Arbitration by a Federal Court (posted by Jihad) the requirement of yesterday's arbitration hearing? janices claims it was not federal court which negates jihads claim it was in federal court. there was no arbitration hearing yesterday. what was the result of this supposed arbitration anyways & what exactly does wellrich want? spider