SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ramsey Su who wrote (27580)1/6/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
"As for me, I am just wondering when every stock on every exchange has been upgraded to strong buy, what else is left for these analysts to do?"

Retire.



To: Ramsey Su who wrote (27580)1/6/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: Fortinwit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Ramsey,

I've analyzed the output of Press Releases of AMAT and AMZN (the current standard bearer in press-releasing).

My analysis shows that in the last 13 weeks, AMAT had 10 items released on PR Newswire and AMZN 23. I did not include press releases from brokerages as that additional noise made the calculations more strenuous for me (and possibly would have invalidated my expected results anyway), after all, my Math degree from Berkeley is rather useless now that I wear the hat of a Wall Street Analyst.

Based on closing prices, AMAT is trading at 5.36 times PressReleases and AMZN is trading at 6 times PressReleases. Based on this new information, I calculate that AMAT is undervalued by approximately 10% and project a target of 60 (that's post-split all around here) for Friday.

F.



To: Ramsey Su who wrote (27580)1/6/1999 9:52:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Ramsey, they invent a category, Super Strong Buy, and then hone their 10 Best Ideas List. Don't worry, these guys can make work until the market turns, at which time they won't have work. <G>

MB



To: Ramsey Su who wrote (27580)1/7/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 70976
 
There's always the old "reiterate".

:-)

Tom