SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HairBall who wrote (3358)1/6/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: Trumptown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
LG - do you expect a follow thru...?

SR



To: HairBall who wrote (3358)1/6/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: j g cordes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
LG.. you made too tempting a comment with "I said the pattern existed and the neckline was penetrated today. I did not say I did or did not expect follow through."

I'll guess you're saying there's a normally positive reverse h&s, but that even though it was penetrated you're not saying penetration indicates follow through. If there's any predictive value to a pattern then one ought to follow through.. or make it a double top that might not have the punch to form a reverse h&s. <g>

Just pullin yer leg...



To: HairBall who wrote (3358)1/6/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Cordless (Cordes) is always wrong.

On that you can rely. Stems from being w/o cord.



To: HairBall who wrote (3358)1/6/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
And your post of course reflects my earlier complaint about TA being too open to interpretation:<G>
Message 6945243

Carl