Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1SFG who wrote (10216)	1/8/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Peter S. Maroulis	Respond to of 13994

Message 7174505 techstocks.com

To: 1SFG who wrote (10216)	1/8/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: Jack Be Quick	Respond to of 13994

John, re:<<Still don't see the tie in to Communism. Does that make Nixon, Agnew, Mafia bosses, etc. Communists?>> Perhaps I can help you to understand the thinking here. The mafia bosses obviously represent "mob" rule. Mob rule is bad, but not as bad as Clinton. On the other hand, Nixon and Agnew obviously represent powerful government officials who, if allowed to win, would thwart the "rule of law". They're bad too, but not as bad as Clinton. Now the communists are just bad, but not as bad as Clinton. It's easy to get confused about the communists because they also have courts that are presided over by judges in robes (w/ optional sleeve piping). This, however, is not to be confused with the "rule of law". (Maybe it's because the communists are not truly "politicos", you'd have to ask Zoltan! directly about that.) So, the tie in is this: everything that is bad is bad, but not as bad as Clinton. Got it? Regards, John