Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (10220)	1/8/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>>Well, the same article mentions some "free-spirited" Democrat moderates too: Byrd, Moynihan, Leibermann and Bob Kerrey. Gee, that's all? But Clinton is guilty! >>If the Senate votes for an acquittal, as is most likely, it is going to be a bipartisan acquittal, with 3 or 4 Republicans and Democrats crossing over to the opposite sides. Not a bad ending for the President. If this is a country worth living in, Clinton will end his days living in ignominy. The latter is not a bad ending for the Republic. And that is what matters.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (10220)	1/8/1999 9:42:00 PM
From: jimpit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<"If the Senate votes for an acquittal, as is most likely, it is going to be a bipartisan acquittal, with 3 or 4 Republicans and Democrats crossing over to the opposite sides. Not a bad ending for the President."> Now, now Dipy... How can such a shift of only a few votes from each side to the other in the Senate be termed "bipartisan" when in the House you were saying it was "partisan Republican zealotry", or some such tripe ? I'd say you were being a bit disingenuous, wouldn't you ? Hhmmm? Or, perhaps it's just your traditional flawed logic?