SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tfk who wrote (14361)1/9/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com  Respond to of 44908
 
A very good answer to a very good question. These are the kinds of things that help each investor.

Thanks Gene and tfk!

Regards,

Bob



To: tfk who wrote (14361)1/9/1999 9:50:00 AM
From: Robert B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
tfk,

I liked your analysis. $3.07/share from the Babe Ruth Deal alone is great. I believe Sam predicted 4 million musiccards to be sold through the Babe Ruth League, so the 25M revenue estimate may be on the conservative side. TSIG will also inherit the revenues from CCI once the merge is complete (the beginning of this year?), and also revenues due to advertising in Rolling Stone and a few other magazines. We've also still got the NMF and Phil Exposito out there, too.

I think because TSIG has a shaky financial history, quite a few outstanding shares, and trades on te OTCBB market- we will probably need to see good revenues from the Babe Ruth League deal and other sources before the share price increases dramatically.

-Rob



To: tfk who wrote (14361)1/9/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: Andrew H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
Yes, tfk,

Very nice summary. I agree. 25M in revenues should result in a market cap of around 175M. More revenues, higher market cap. Of course the nunbers will vary a bit, but it is a pretty reliable formula.

Now ADD to that the fact that TSIG should be nicely PROFITABLE far in advance of CDNW and NTKI.... that is where the calculations become difficult.



To: tfk who wrote (14361)1/9/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: cicak  Respond to of 44908
 
tfk - I appreciate your analysis. Thanks !

Regards,

Phil