SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ALL IN PAUL who wrote (1850)1/10/1999 11:25:00 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 45639
 
Yes, I'm arguing lack of possession. I'm not saying the ref should care about a player's actions, but you should for the purpose of his debate. Kirby didn't think he was down, the ref with a good view didn't think he was down, most who saw the replay didn't think he was down . . . yet, it was so "obvious" that they had to overturn it?

Tom



To: ALL IN PAUL who wrote (1850)1/12/1999 1:48:00 AM
From: Mick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45639
 
That would have been the right call if an official blew the whistle, because right or wrong, when the whistle blows, the play is over. The announcers said the whistle did not blow which means play is not over,....fumble....Atlanta touchdown.

But as Joe Theismann says its only an issue because of the gambling.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News