Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Yang who wrote (22170)	1/11/1999 12:58:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

At .75, I believe a fair value for AAPL is the $50 range...which is likely to push it over 55 just after announcement.

To: Eric Yang who wrote (22170)	1/11/1999 2:01:00 PM
From: setzkell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213173

Eric, as usual very nice job. I gather that you are discounting Job's 520,000 iMacs based the actual year end as opposed to MW announcement date. I have been wondering if they if they shipped any iMacs at all after Christmas. I am also curious regarding Powerbooks. Looking back , your 4th qtr. est was for 130k units I see from your 1st qtr99 estimate chart that the previous qtr.(ie.4th) has been adjusted to 120k units shipped; down 10k from you estimate. Are the actual units shipped numbers available somewhere? Also I am always confused on this point. (This is for anybody) Are the EPS estimate numbers base on undiluted or diluted shares? I think its undiluted. Actually Eric you Macevolution efforts are just a little more than nice Very impressive is more like it. I think you perked up David Stern for one. Much to my amazement I am still holding my shares. Thanks, pjkelly

To: Eric Yang who wrote (22170)	1/11/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Alomex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

From Salon Magazine: salonmagazine.com But as with the mass-audience-targeted iMac's omission of a floppy disk drive -- the least-common-denominator storage medium -- the G3s' abandonment of SCSI seems like an act of rudeness to its primary customers. I support Apple's decision to drop the floppy, but this guy has a point. Starting from the lack of backward compatibility in the transition from Apple II to Mac, the lack of choice and upgrade option in monitor size on the original Mac and all the way to the latest decision of not having SCSI port on a machine designed for a user base with large number of SCSI devices, Apple comes across as rude, even if the decisions were technologically sound...