Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27485)	1/12/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 67261

...republicans in California are either old curmudgeons out of touch with the real world, or young nutcase religious zealots? Precisely. I don't know if there is a better way to put that.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (27485)	1/12/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<However, I was a statistics major and as such I had to take a lot of physics etc.>> Oh my, we have more in common than I thought. Although I didn't know you young folks had to take physics as a prerequisite to stats. But as a stats major, how did you come to your conclusions on the November poll data? Did you use correlation, regression, discriminant analysis or did you opt for ANOVA? What statistical measures of association did you use and which dependent variables did you use to assess causality? What inferences on the population were made for you to assess statistical significance? As long as you want to get quantitative on me, I'm all ears!