Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (27557)	1/12/1999 10:04:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Let's see, I was watching CNBC enjoying my morning and someone came on and shook his finger and made an UGLY face and said " I didn't have sex with that woman... Monica Lewinski". Like I asked? I'm an American people and the same guy said if a president lied to the American people he shouldn't be in office. Pretty cut and dried to me. Still shouldn't be an impeachment trial.

To: j g cordes who wrote (27557)	1/13/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<But prosecuting for lying about sex by consenting adults is none of anyone's business but those involved.>> That is of course what the WH told you to focus on. Are you getting any good at letting the White house think for you? What is, "is?" What is "sexual?" What is "alone?" How about lying about sex to avoid prosecution in a civil suit? How about lying about sex to avoid prosecution by a grand jury? How about lying about sex to gain power and get support by deceiving the sympathetic dupes you are supposed to be representing? Whoops sorry, the WH doesn't want you to think about that.