Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (27602)	1/13/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Sure, brees. You might want to ask the Chief Justice who I is, while you're at it. If it's not about sex, then it's about insufficient cooperation with some pretty sleazy prosecutorial tactics. Remember, at this point, it's not about perjury in the Jones case, it's allegedly perjury via insufficient cooperation in confessing perjury in the Jones case, which is a little too convoluted for me. If you get confused telling the Grand Inquisitor the "truth", watch out, he'll decide what the "truth" is and if you don't concur with his objective and impartial judgement, you're in deep doo-doo. Ask Julie Steele or Susan McDougal, or Monica Lewinsky for that matter. Or is Linda Tripp you, too?

To: one_less who wrote (27602)	1/13/1999 10:41:00 AM
From: j g cordes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

brees.. don't be paranoid, I can assure you nobody told me to think anything but my own thoughts and judgements from experience, let alone the WH. Some people are fortunate. They go to high school and meet their true love for life, never thinking about anyone else, raising Ozzie and Harriet kids, their teeth are white with no cavities and the attend the PTA and scouts. They are a minority because life usually doesn't provide a simple and clear cut life. Many are torn between, even among different love interests, which is ok because that's what nature intended.. it also intended to have fidelity to see through the safe raising of children. The two aren't incompatible as you're thinking to yourself. Regarding Clinton having to testify in a civil case, that's fair and square for Jones to be able to seek justice. However the linkage between the Jones case and Lewinsky is frail and has all the signs of intended collusion between Starr's office and Jones. If not collusion then conspiracy by encouraging Tripp's communications the day Lewinsky was detained. Clinton created his own lies about sex, an area he obviously felt he could squeeze through on technicalities. However, no matter how you impugn purjury or obstruction, the case rests on the government through Starr's office encouraging a situation which would ensnare the President. But to make something very clear.. the WH pr campaign means no more to me than the GOP campaign and by putting anyone's opinion in a basket like that only means you can't respect others thoughts on this matter. Lets give it a rest and get back to work.