SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (11748)1/12/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: freddy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 26850
 
You make a good point,but,why should this be considered a representative sample? First of all,it was only 1.14 cts/ton,far lower than chemistry predicted,certainly lower than our "Russian Team" had predicted and even Mr. Kaiser was disappointed with such a low result.
Remember,this is the tip of the iceberg.Higher grades will come with bigger samples[it's only logical]Kaiser's time would be better spent in pondering where are all the other "big stones" hiding or then again maybe somebody stole them.



To: average joe who wrote (11748)1/13/1999 1:24:00 AM
From: .Trev  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
it takes an idiot to say that finding large diamonds is bad news, and an even bigger one to parrot the comment.

Finding large stones is the sole objective of exploration for diamonds, but then you wouldn't know that. Is somebody paying you for the disruption you try to cause ?????