SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: teevee who wrote (11755)1/12/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
teevee can you explain what a coonsheet is, and is it open
in all directions. Also, up is a direction, do these coon
sheets go up to?

aj



To: teevee who wrote (11755)1/13/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: The Fix  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26850
 
TeeVee, I read somewhere that at least three pipes come up at a time and they are all within 3000 feet of each other! Is this true?

fIXER



To: teevee who wrote (11755)1/13/1999 12:31:00 PM
From: VAUGHN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Hello Teevee

Most diamondiferous kimberlites have populations of both eclogitic and peridotitic diamonds. The eclogitic tend to be formed at a deeper level and are probably associated with the 300km sourced stones you referred to. They also tend to be the larger stones according to my reading. The depth you suggest intrigues me though. Can you tell me how you arrived at this conclusion as I am not aware of any mantle root that deep under the Slave Craton at least the Lithoprobe data does not suggest that.

When you suggest multiple cones based on the variation in the diamond source depth and population, you should also keep in mind that phased emplacement is fairly common and often separated by considerable time spans. Different types of kimberlite with different chemistries and diamond types and populations are often found within the same diatrem. I have heard of I believe, as many as eight distinct emplacement phases. Therefore, while root zones may have multiple sills, they are just as likely to have kimberlite consistency/chemistry variations.

That is one of the reasons why only a bulk sample can provide and be considered a true indication of a kimberlite's grade. Be cautious about drawing conclusions from very small sample sizes or very localized sample sites.

Regards