Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (27855)	1/14/1999 10:32:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

The insanity is the mock trial. The Democrats convened a defense presentation to their party members that were noncommittal about the President. There were estimated to be 15 Democrats who were keeping an open mind on the trial. washtimes.com In the real world, those jurors would be dismissed and the presenters would be also.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (27855)	1/14/1999 1:12:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 67261

Fat chance of what? That you still think the messenger matters? Yes I'll believe what I will- hard truth where possible. I don't believe in the antichrist. I've enjoyed siding with Clinton. In his term of office I've written one guest editorial which ran in my local regional paper- it was on Clintons side of the Nafta issue- I thought he was great on that one(yes, I'm confident you're anti-nafta- I'd rather not have it either, I'd rather simply have no U.S. tariffs on trade whatsoever). This is just to indicate that there is no bias against the man on my part. It's issue by issue. But on this issue we all know the lengths he's gone to harm the women he's brought into his life through his denials- one of us seems to think it's proper to defend him on that issue- and I'm glad it's not me! As to your last question, I don't know who killed Vince Foster. I've been meaning to look see if Starr actually provided evidence to explain the extremely suspicious disrepancies starting with a suicide note that was "overlooked"- then found later- found torn up into bits yet devoid of fingerprints- and independently suspected to be a forgery by several leading handwriting experts. But I'm sure you'd rather not have to consider such evidence- such realities might make you feel uneasy about your golden boy. But maybe Starr debunked these and other discrepancies- can anyone show me where?