SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (46036)1/14/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 1570897
 
Tony,

What server design company do you think is going to entrust the CPU to a company that speaks with forked tongue like this?


I seem to recall a number of conflicting statements from Intel about the 8-way chipset vs. Xeon problem. Product delays bring out the worst in all companies.

Scumbria



To: Tony Viola who wrote (46036)1/14/1999 6:02:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1570897
 
Tony,

I just listened to the conference call, and heard them explicitly describe the 400 Mhz problems as "design and process related". Also the comment was made, "there was one speedpath" which kept their speed distribution down.

Someone is spreading misinformation about the conference call.

Scumbria



To: Tony Viola who wrote (46036)1/15/1999 1:34:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570897
 
Tony, the term "mask problem" was used for the lame-brained analysts -- it really describes the solution rather than the problem. The nature of the problem was related more clearly later in the CC. Don't expect Techweb to report such esoterica.

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News