Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: From_Verbier who wrote (7917)	1/15/1999 9:10:00 AM
From: May Tran	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

FV Glenn's office is different with Taylor's office. Glenn's office is handling the PR, that's true. But Glenn was not at the meeting with Warren and Terri. I don't know where he's gone, but without him in the office, I don't know who would be handling the PR. I didn't say I got it from Taylor that there will be no news. Those were my opinions and my reading from my chrystal ball only. Johnny

To: From_Verbier who wrote (7917)	1/17/1999 5:10:00 PM
From: steve armon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

It appears as though the secretary my friend talked to was misinformed about an impending news release. I am not exactly sure what to make of this but in the future I won't be passing on information which I have myself have not confirmed. I am much more concerned about the financial situation of PNLK and am wondering why they don't release their financials if only to dispel the concerns of some that everything isn't on the up and up. My sense is that they are doing business in good faith for themselves and for their stockholders but public perception is a powerful thing. I feel that some effort should be made to reassure the stockholders that their business plan is on course. They could accomplish this without tipping off competitors who by now surely know of PNLK's existence. Some up to date audited financials at this point can only help. Being a start up company initial losses are expected but more importantly everyone concerned will know where they stand. Perhaps the thought at the company is that keeping the stockholders up to date at this stage of the game is not that important and that the focus should be on executing their business plan. If this is the case I think they should consider that a strong company/stockholder relationship is crucial and now is the time when they should be forming a strong base of loyal well informed stockholders so that if v3 is delayed or gets off to a rocky start the impact on the stock price will be minimized. If you believe in the idea behind this company and you believe in the people running it you will accumulate shares in the tough times and not just dump and run. Thanks for letting me vent. Steve