SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (22691)1/16/1999 5:44:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 



Riding the bull



Posted at 10:07 p.m. PDT; Sunday, May 3, 1998

Stephen Dunphy / Times Staff Columnist



NEW YORK - At the opening of trading on a
recent day in the stock market, shares in
Physio-Control were lower. Not much, but enough
to attract a little attention.

One of the people attracted to Physio stock that day
was Landon Ray, 30, a new breed of day trader
operating in a counterculture trading room a few
doors away from the imposing old-money facade of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE). Ray doesn't know Physio is based in
Redmond, Wash. He doesn't know it makes a life-saving medical
device for heart-attack victims. He doesn't know it is a company
providing more than 850 people their livelihoods.

And he doesn't care. "The stock's moving," he says. That's enough
for him. He buys shares of Physio and sells them again in less than
90 seconds. He has guessed right and pockets $250 on the trade.

Watching Ray trade makes the stock market seem like one huge
incomprehensible gamble. But it is into this mysterious world that
more and more ordinary people are venturing, with fewer and
fewer knowing exactly what it is all about.

But learning what it is all about is key.

The stock market has become a major source of wealth for many
of us. Where we once invested in staid and government-protected
bank certificates of deposit, we now have much of our sense of
financial well-being tied up in a riskier investment that can go up -
or down - freely.

Recently, it has gone up; it's a bull market. In the first part of this
year alone, the market as measured by the Dow Jones industrial
average has set a half-dozen records and has closed above 9,000
for the first time in its history. Many investors talk blithely of Dow
10,000. The widely quoted Dow average is based on a composite
of the prices of stock in 30 big-ticket companies.

Just last week, the market put on another spurt, gaining almost 200
points Thursday and Friday to close at 9,147.07, less than 40
points shy of its closing record of 9,184.94, set April 21.

The size of the market has also increased dramatically. The value of
all stocks in 1980 was $1.44 trillion. At the end of last year, that
had grown to about $13 trillion. A stack of $1 bills representing
$1.44 trillion would extend about 93,000 miles into space, more
than a third of the way to the moon. A stack representing $13
trillion would extend 851,894 miles, or about two complete round
trips to the moon.

As recently as 1980, the average volume of shares traded on the
NYSE was 45 million a day. On the Nasdaq (stands for National
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation) market, it
was 26 million shares. Today, the two exchanges trade a combined
average of more than 1 billion shares a day. The NYSE is
upgrading its computers to the point where it will be able to handle
6 billion shares a day.

How important has the market become? A recent study based on
data from the Federal Reserve Board showed that we Americans
have a larger share of our money invested in the stock market than
at any time in the past 50 years.

The study showed that stock investments made up 28 percent of
household wealth - a measure that includes houses, cars and other
tangible assets as well as financial assets. And stocks accounted for
43 percent of financial assets, which also include bank accounts,
bonds and mutual funds. Those numbers have more than doubled
since 1990.

But there are voices that caution against regarding the stock market
as a magic arcade that creates and dispenses wealth.

"Remember you don't get rich investing," says Ernie Ankrim, a
portfolio adviser for the Frank Russell Co., a pension-fund
consulting and money management firm in Tacoma. "You only
increase your wealth from the dollars you made elsewhere."

What does that mean? After three years of rapidly rising stock
prices and a great first quarter of this year, many of us are feeling
richer as the value of our stock holdings rises. In fact, aside from
our paychecks, stocks are the likely source of much of our feeling
of financial security.

That has been translated into the economy, which is now nearing its
eighth year of growth, the second-longest period of sustained
economic progress since the end of World War II.

But there is another side to the market, one that has not been seen
for quite a while: Stocks can go down quite suddenly and
dramatically.

With so much invested in stocks, a sharp market decline could
seriously change our sense of financial well-being. And the
economy's.

As recently as the early 1970s, the market went down - and stayed
down. Both 1973 and 1974 were years of decline for the Dow
Jones industrial average - the Dow lost almost half its value,
dropping 44 percent, during those two years. If that were to
happen today, the market would be at about 4,000 in May 2000.

In 1970, the Dow ended the year at 838.92. In 1979 it was at
838.74.

Few expect it to stay so flat today, given the amount of money
entering the market and the computer-programmed "circuit
breakers" in place to hold sell-offs in check, at least temporarily.
Besides, investors have been taught by recent events that almost
every downward slide in the market is a buying opportunity.

In years past, the biggest asset for many of us was the home,
making the real-estate market far more important than the stock
market in personal finance. In the late 1980s as today, skyrocketing
home prices in the Seattle area helped people here feel much better
off. And when interest rates declined, home refinancings and
home-equity accounts skyrocketed, putting some of that new-found
wealth in our pockets.

The recent strength in the real-estate market here probably means
homes are still the largest store of potential wealth in the Puget
Sound area. It's hard to compete with a housing market where the
average price is $246,000. But the stock market is a close second
and gaining. For some, such as Microsoft workers who are sitting
on a pile of unexercised options totaling more than $20 billion, the
market is the major store of wealth.

Boeing, Starbucks, Seafirst and a number of other companies here
are increasingly using options for employee compensation. Options,
the right to buy stock at a set price at some time in the future, have
increased dramatically in recent years, pushing more and more
people into the often arcane, confusing and downright scary world
of stocks.

To help understand the stock market, let's go back to what Landon
Ray is doing in New York.

The New York Stock Exchange is situated in a classic building at
Wall and Broad streets in the financial district of lower Manhattan.
Any time you've seen a news photograph or a film clip about the
stock market, that's the NYSE.

Landon Ray is what's called a day trader - some in the
establishment refer to him as a "bandit" - someone in and out of the
market very quickly. He operates out of a trading room at 50
Broad St., a few doors down the street from the NYSE and light
years away in tradition, importance and dress code. Take the
elevator to the second floor and walk through a sparsely furnished
office. A gray metal folding chair for visitors sits next to a
receptionist.

Ray sits in a drab, darkened room, trading stocks, eyes glued to the
computer screen before him. About 50 others - almost all male -
are in the same room. Ray is trading - for himself alone - on the
difference in price between dealers who want to sell stocks and
dealers who want to buy stocks. Ray can actually make money
doing this.

Why is he trading Physio's shares? "It was on the list of the top 10
down stocks today. The stock is moving."

Does he know what Physio does? "No, don't care, the stock is
moving."

Ray is perhaps the direct opposite of people like you and me
investing in the market these days. For most of us, investing in
stocks is a way to ensure our retirement, pay for college education
or increase our wealth so we can enjoy the good life.

We buy and hold. We turn to mutual funds to help us spread our
risk. We invest in Starbucks or Nordstrom because we know them
and know they are good companies.

Do you understand that Ray is trading "inside the spread" of stocks
listed on the Nasdaq exchange? Should you care? Do you know
what happens when you check the box for aggressive growth on
the mutual fund in your company 401(k) form? Should you care?
Are you different from Ray?

The questions about the stock market are as varied as the 8,000 to
10,000 companies listed on the various exchanges. Trying to find
the answers to those questions can be frustrating because many of
the experts in the market assume you know what is going on.

That is not really the case.

"Most people want to buy a car, put it in drive and aim it," says
Richard Syron, president of the American Stock Exchange. "They
don't care about the transmission and how it works. We're the
transmission."

The questions are simple, but they are basic to what happens in the
market.

Who handles all those trades? Who accounts for a share of stock
that you sell on the NYSE or the Amex or the Nasdaq, also known
as the over-the-counter market? Who gets my money when I buy
stock? Who sends me proof that I own shares when I buy?

Why does the stock market go up or down, anyway? Will I look
stupid if I don't get in the market now? How can I tell when it is
time to get out of the market?

Many questions. Here are some answers.

The floor of the New York Stock Exchange looks like some sort of
financial ant farm. Everyone is scurrying about doing things, but
exactly what is hard to fathom.

For all that chaos, some important things are happening, most of
them having to do with your sense of wealth. Here is where stocks
are traded, where buyers and sellers come together to determine
the price at which the stocks change hands.

Stocks seem mysterious. But they're not.

When you own a share of stock, you own a piece of the expected
profits of the company. You also own a piece of the potential
losses of the company. Both are important to keep in mind.

Companies go to the stock market for several reasons, but the chief
one is to raise money. Cavanaugh Hospitality is a Spokane-based
hotel company that converted an office building in downtown
Seattle to one of their hotels a few years ago. Cavanaugh recently
"went public," listing its shares on the New York Stock Exchange.

It was an exciting day for them, listing on the day the market first
crossed the 9,000 mark. Company officials got to ring the bell at
the opening of trading. A huge cream-colored flag with the
company name hung outside the exchange all day.

But the real impact of listing is that the company received
$72,191,250 from investors who bought its shares. It will use the
money to pay down debt, allowing it to expand into other markets,
and for other corporate needs. And its stock will start trading on
the exchange with investors trying to decide whether to buy the
stock or sell it.

The market itself is no different from one of those used-car swap
meets. You have an '89 Nissan Sentra to sell, and someone wants
to buy a good used car at a good price. You bargain and agree on
a price, with perhaps the help of an auctioneer who knows the
going price for a clean '89 Sentra.

On the floor of the NYSE, broker Brian Toolan is Boeing's
"used-car" auctioneer. He is the specialist who helps keep order in
the market for stock of the Puget Sound area's largest employer.

"There was a good report out on Boeing this morning," Toolan
says. "So it is trading up. It's come off its bottom around $50."

Translation: An analyst who follows Boeing has put out a research
report. The analyst believes the company's production problems
are near to being resolved and has urged that stockbrokers
recommend Boeing to their customers. The result is that more
people want to buy Boeing stock this morning than sell it. Boeing's
price rises.

Not everyone wants to buy. A floor broker comes to Toolan and
wants to sell 200,000 shares for a client. (Brokers know each other
and know who they work for. However, they request that specific
trades remain confidential.)

Toolan explains what is happening to the broker who wants to sell
Boeing stock. Toolan can match 50,000 shares right now at the
current price - he has that many orders to buy. The seller agrees
and writes the order on a ticket that is handed to a clerk. Trade
done.

Seconds later, another broker is at Toolan's trading post.

"What's the market?" he asks.

"Up a teenie," says Toolan, who like most stock-market specialists
seems to have the ability to carry on several conversations at once.
A "teenie" is a sixteenth of a dollar in the trading of the stock.

The Boeing seller, now with 150,000 shares to unload, bargains
briefly with the new buyer - maybe for 10 seconds - and 50,000
more shares change hands, up another teenie.

Meanwhile, more orders are coming into Toolan's trading post
electronically from brokers around the country. Toolan matches the
buy orders and sell orders to keep the market moving and the price
current. After an hour of trading, Boeing is up almost 50 cents a
share, because there were more buyers than sellers. Volume has
been strong, more than 500,000 shares. It's a good day.

Nasdaq's market makers

On the other side of town, in a high-rise building with a view of the
Hudson River, another part of the market unfolds. In the giant
trading room of Salomon Smith Barney, brokers are buying and
selling stock, trying to buy as stocks are headed up and sell as
they're going down.

This is where many of the orders processed by Toolan and his
counterparts come from. These brokers are working for clients -
individual investors, pension funds, large family trusts, mutual funds
with money from 401(k) plans - hundreds of different sources for
orders for stock.

In a tiered part toward one end of Smith Barney's large trading
room, brokers are buying and selling stocks on the Nasdaq market.
One dealer handles nothing but Microsoft, the largest company on
the Nasdaq and one that trades millions of shares a day.

Nasdaq is the new kid on the block. The over-the-counter market
existed for many years with a cumbersome paper system. In the
early 1980s, it was automated and became a computer-based
trading system. It has grown rapidly since then to become the
second-largest stock market.

To understand the market, it's essential to note the critical
difference between the auction-style trading system used at the
New York Stock Exchange (and the much smaller American Stock
Exchange) and the computer-driven, dealer-style Nasdaq system.

One writer described auction markets as a swap meet, where car
buyers and sellers deal with one another, vs. Nasdaq's used-car lot
where buyers and sellers trade with dealers.

Under the auction system, investors send orders through their
brokers to the floor of an exchange. Brokers representing buyers
and sellers gather at a specific location for each stock and negotiate
prices. If a block of shares is offered for sale or purchase and no
broker steps forward to make a deal, an exchange specialist can
buy or sell from his company's own account. The haggling is
supposed to yield prices that efficiently reflect the forces of supply
and demand.

In a dealer system, buyers and sellers also send orders through their
brokers, but there is no exchange floor for haggling. Instead, the
brokers trade with dealers called market makers, who use
computers to post prices at which they are willing to buy and sell
specific stocks. (The main computer that lists the stocks and
executes orders is located in Trumbull, Conn., with a backup
operations center in Rockville, Md.)

Your broker may deal with only certain market makers even though
others trade the same stocks. Critics say this system results in a
lack of competition and that sweetheart deals between brokers and
market makers put some individual investors at a disadvantage.

The difference between the market maker's "buy" price and the
somewhat higher "sell" price is called "the spread" and represents
the market maker's profit. Several years ago, Nasdaq was
embroiled in controversy when regulators found that market makers
were colluding to keep the spreads unnaturally wide. That meant
buyers paid more than they would have in an honest market, while
sellers received less.

In 1996, Nasdaq settled its price-fixing dispute with the Securities
and Exchange Commission by agreeing to spend $100 million to
improve its market oversight. Arthur Levitt, chairman of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pushed for changes that
resulted in smaller spreads and ensured that pros don't get better
prices than small investors.

The floor broker

There is a faded blue line that runs around the floor of the New
York Stock Exchange. It separates the floor brokers' work space
from the formal auction part of the market. Amid the ant-farm
chaos of the exchange floor, Joseph Cangemi studies an order to
sell $50 million in stock. He's a floor broker with Francis P. Maglio
& Co., and plays a part in the 600 million shares or $26 billion
traded in a typical day.

"He's wrong to sell, but let's do it," Cangemi says of his client, and
sets off across the blue line to the specialists in the stock. The trade
is done quickly, but Cangemi is still able to help his client a bit by
spreading the order out among several buyers. The specialist in the
stock helps out by picking up 5,000 shares from the electronic
orders that have come to his position.

Floor brokers, who buy or sell stock by negotiating prices with
other brokers, are outspoken - to say the least - and capable of
calling out a multimillion-dollar sale with a few words or market
shorthand.

Cangemi, 36, came to Wall Street as an intern while still in high
school in Queens, N.Y. A customer on his newspaper route had
suggested he might like the Street and hired him for the summer.
After studying finance in college, Cangemi returned to the firm and
eventually left to help start Maglio.

He is pushing for more technology on the floor, especially a
hand-held computerized tool that would help him trade stocks more
efficiently. While 90 percent of trades on the floor are processed
electronically already, there is more to be done, he says.

Cangemi's job is to look out for the firm's customers and make the
best trade that he can on the stock in question.

He doesn't always agree with the decision to buy or sell, but he'll
execute the trade as well as he can.

Dressed in a gray suit and Rockport walkers, Cangemi hustles
about the floor gripping pads of pink and white paper used to jot
down offers and trades.

Approaching the specialist for a tobacco company, he asks about
the latest action on the stock. Numbers flash buy on what is called
the ticker, an electronic display board that records each trade on
the floor. Minutes later the deal is done.

Will technology replace him? No, says Cangemi, because it is only
by visual, person-to-person contact that investors can get the best
price on a trade.

And after all, that's why the markets are there in the first place.

Tomorrow in The Seattle Times: The stock market changes
direction for what may seem like incomprehensible reasons.
Learn why investors buy and sell they way they do.

Stephen H. Dunphy's phone message number is 206-464-2365.
His e-mail address is: sdun-new@seatimes.com

Glossary of stock market's terms

When gold glittered, stocks sank

How to know how market is faring










To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (22691)1/16/1999 5:52:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 


Minor surgery is surgery someone else is having.
- J. CARL COOK




The Wall Street establishment calls them bandits.
To ordinary investors they look more like Robin
Hoods. Meet the guerrilla marketmakers who are
helping squeeze down the cost of Nasdaq
trading.

Free enterprise comes to
Wall Street

By Matthew Schifrin with Scott McCormack

IT'S JUST DOWN THE BLOCK
from the New York Stock
Exchange, at 50 Broad Street,
but not nearly so grand. Take the
elevator to the second floor and
walk through a sparsely
furnished office suite and you come to a dimly lit,
makeshift trading room. There, from 9:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. each weekday, sit 50 people all males
eyes firmly attached to monitors. The players are
mostly under 30, wearing T shirts, blue jeans and
baseball caps. They talk to one another even as
they pound on the keyboards. More often they
just stare intently or blurt insults at the screens.

A videogame arcade? You could easily mistake it
for one. In fact, a lot of money is changing hands
in this guerrilla trading room where smart
freelancers are competing against giant
over-the-counter marketmakers like Merrill
Lynch, Goldman, Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Knight
Securities. These traders hope to get rich by
shaving small slices off marketmaker spreads in
o-t-c stocks like Dell, Amazon.com, Excite,
Yahoo!, Intel and Microsoft.

Thanks to market reforms inspired in part by
FORBES' exposés of excessive spreads in o-t-c
markets (Aug.16, 1993; July 29, 1996)--these
young, guerrilla marketmakers are often able to
dance around the big players. Helped by fast,
relatively inexpensive technology, they pick off
eighths, sixteenths, thirty-seconds and even
sixty-fourths of a point per share, but on
tremendous volume. By the closing bell, most
have sold out of all their positions, ready to do
battle again in the morning.

The young men in this room are only a fraction of
the guerrilla marketmakers currently on the
prowl. They are customers of a small brokerage
firm, Broadway Trading. This outfit provides
them with the hardware and software to make
markets and charges them 2 cents a share in
commissions on their trades. An affiliate trains
them to day-trade for a $1,200 upfront fee.

Other than that, the traders are on their own,
playing with their own money. Last year
Broadway's 300 customers, many trading from
remote locations, accounted for more than 1
billion shares in Nasdaq trading volume—0.7%
of its total.

The establishment sneered at
SOES bandits. Robin Hoods
might be a better description,
though the day-traders' motives
were no more pure than the big
brokers'.

Other guerrilla marketmakers there are about
2,000 of them in all probably account for another
12% of Nasdaq volume. But it is not just the
competition that irks the big brokerage houses.
With their low overhead, the guerrilla
marketmakers have helped narrow the fat trading
spreads Nasdaq marketmakers have long
wallowed in.

For years, this is what happened if you wanted to
buy or sell a Nasdaq stock: Your buy order went
to a marketmaking firm, which charged you the
offer side of the market, pocketing the difference
between that price and the lower bid. This
difference is the spread. The marketmakers rarely
allowed customers to trade inside the spread,
even if one customer was willing to pay the same
price that another customer wanted to sell his
stock for.

It wasn't exactly a monopoly. It was more, shall
we say, a closed game. The Securities &
Exchange Commission finally pried the game
open and let in people like Serge Milman. This
crew-cut 25-year-old from Saint Petersburg,
Russia is out to make a buck, but he and people
like him are saving investors tens, possibly
hundreds, of millions of dollars a year.

Milman traded 30 million shares of stock last
year and grossed about $1.4 million. After paying
commissions to Broadway, Milman claims to
have taken home $800,000 before taxes.

Milman makes about 150 trades each day,
mostly in lots of 1,000 shares or fewer, and
rarely holds a stock more than ten minutes. To
Serge Milman it's just a numbers game. He
doesn't know or care what any of the companies
do. He doesn't read the Wall Street Journal or
any other investment publications, nor does he do
any research.

Watch him in action. With the stroke of a key
Serge buys 1,000 shares of ALCD. "What's that
stock?" asks a visitor. "I have no idea, dude. It
has a big spread, and it's moving. I like to get
inside the market on those kinds of stocks," he
says. A few minutes later he is out of ALCD, a hot
biotech company, with a couple of thousand
dollars in profit.

In mid-March XCIT, the stock symbol for Internet
search-engine company Excite, opened at around
$50 per share. After a few minutes of trading it
pulled back so that its bid was 493/8 and its offer
was 493/4, a 3/8 spread.

A spread like that is pure gold for people like
Milman. Using software that links him directly to
Nasdaq marketmakers and a private trading
system called Island, Milman checked further. He
discovered that there were three marketmakers
on XCIT's bid and two on the offer. He figured
XCIT would rebound. Taking advantage of the
wide spread between bid and offer, he bid 497/16
for 1,000 sharesa 16th over the best
marketmaker bid. (A 16th in marketmaker
parlance is a "teenie.")

In the past Milman's bid would not have
appeared on the Nasdaq screens because official
Nasdaq marketmakers posted bids at their
discretion. Before the new SEC-mandated rules,
marketmakers would often let limit orders pile up
unexecuted unless the market rose or dropped to
a point where they could get their accustomed
spread. In the end the SEC decreed, in August
1996, that marketmakers were colluding and
gouging the public. In December 1997
marketmakers agreed to pay $1 billion to settle a
class action that investors brought. Equally
important, the gates of Nasdaq were thrown
wide open.

The most important provisions of the rules force
marketmakers to fill or broadcast a customer's
limit orders to all other marketmakers on the
Nasdaq system if it improves on the inside price.
It also let private trading systems called ECNs
(electronic communications networks) post their
prices on the same system. No more can dealers
sit on an order until it pays them their spread.

Back to Serge Milman and his XCIT. Having
topped the marketmakers' bid, Milman got first in
line to execute an order at market. The first
1,000 shares for sale at market went to him at
497/16. Almost immediately he offered to sell for
4911/16—still lower than the asked price posted
by the big marketmakers. Milman guessed right,
and the stock was taken off his hands in just 12
seconds. In a few strokes of the keyboard he
netted $210 and cut the spread by 1/8 of a point.

Multiply that by hundreds of trades per day and
thousands of day-traders around the country and
you can see why trading spreads are narrowing
and why the big marketmakers with their high
overhead complain that they can't make money in
the traditional way.

So profitable was the over-the-counter business
that big marketmakers like Herzog, Heine,
Geduld; Troster Singer; and Charles Schwab's
Mayer & Schweitzer paid retail brokers to send
them their "order flow," that is, the right to
execute their Nasdaq orders. They still sell order
flow, but the price for order flow has dropped by
more than 50% in the last year. It could fall
further.

The big winners, of course, are
investorsprofessional and individualwho now can
buy or sell Nasdaq stocks at far more reasonable
transaction costs. The National Association of
Securities Dealers says spreads on Nasdaq
stocks are down 30% in the past year. If the
figure is correct, that squeeze saves investors
some $20 billion a year.

Freelancers like Serge Milman require nothing
more than a quick brain and some money. For
what they need to trade, they go to places like
Broadway Trading. Broadway was founded just
last year by Marc Friedfertig and George West,
formerly American Stock Exchange options
traders. "I made markets in dozens of Wells
Fargo options contracts, but the costs and the
risks I faced began to outweigh the rewards,"
says Friedfertig.

Other Wall Streeters have heeded the call. Sitting
next to Serge Milman in Broadway's trading
room is Steven Girden, 36, a former o-t-c
marketmaker at Bear, Stearns' risk arbitrage
desk. "Big marketmakers have always had an
edge in terms of order information. But with our
new trading software, the playing field has
become level."

Broadway and other firms use ECNs similar to but
on a smaller scale than Reuters' Instinet. They are
basically electronic limit order books that match
buyers and sellers without any middleman.

One of the fastest-growing networks is Island. It
was formed in the mid-1990s by a couple of guys
who never made it through college, Jeffrey Citron
and Joshua Levine. Like a lot of the other
guerrilla marketmakers, Citron and Levine got
their start through Nasdaq's Small Order
Execution System, or SOES. An early response to
critics of Nasdaq's voluntary dealer market, SOES
allowed orders of 1,000 shares or fewer to be
executed automatically at marketmakers'
advertised quotes. The idea was to give small
investors a break. Few small investors knew
about it or took advantage of it, but it gave rise to
a cadre of day- traders who sought to exploit the
new system. As long as they dealt in lots of 1,000
shares or fewer, they could use the system and
get their orders executed instantly. People like
Milman became what the establishment sneered
at as SOES bandits, blaming them for unnecessary
volatility. Robin Hoods might be a better
description, though the day-traders' motives were
no more pure than the big brokers'.

Island cofounder Citron was a trader for a SOES
firm that has evolved into the currently hot
Internet Web brokerage Datek Online. His
partner, Levine, started as a runner, but soon
began writing software programs. Over the years
Levine figured out how to efficiently access and
interface with Nasdaq's SOES and SelectNet
system.

Citron and Levine saw
marketmakers weren't matching
orders that didn't give them their
spread. Match trades privately?
They found there were no rules
preventing this.

Pooling their complementary skills, Levine and
Citron developed a series of DOS-based
programs that made monitoring stocks and
trading easier and faster. On a single screen the
system allows traders to monitor the market, their
current positions and other indicators. It also lets
them view marketmaker quotes in any three
stocks at a time and to execute transactions in
any of the three.

These were very smart boys. They soon noticed
a quirk in the Nasdaq software: If they were to
place a SOES bid that said "I'll buy at the offer or
up to 20% over it," their order would
automatically take precedence over all other
market orders and would give them an advantage
in a rising market. Levine created a program that
with a stroke of a key would create such an
order.

When Levine and Citron tried to sell their trading
software, called the Watcher, to The Street, the
big houses would have none of it. Perhaps they
hoped the whole spread-cutting business would
just go away. But day-traders ate it up.

Citron and Levine also noted that marketmakers
were failing to match buy and sell orders that
didn't give them their accustomed spread. Say
there was an offer to buy 1,000 shares of Intel at
$75, and another order to sell it at $75. Nothing
would happen because crossing the order would
create only a commission but no spread. Most
times the orders would go unexecuted.

Why not match the trades in a private transaction
system? The pair checked NASD regulations and
discovered that there were no rules preventing
this, so they created software and a network of
personal computers that would simulate a giant
electronic limit order book.

Levine and Citron dubbed their new private
trading system Island. The name symbolized that
they operated outside of Nasdaq but had a
bridge to it. Here is how Island works:

When a broker or trader who uses Island places
a buy order, it is routed first to Island to check
for matches. If there are none, the order is posted
electronically in the Nasdaq marketplace by
Island. If a matching order comes into Island at
the same price a few seconds later, say, the
forwarded order is matched with the new order
on Island.

Island offers not only lower cost but speed of
operation. Charging only $1 per transaction
regardless of size, Island is cheaper than
Nasdaq's SelectNet or Instinet. Island is a key
factor in the success of fast-growing Internet
brokerage Datek Online. Datek has more than
$1 billion in customer assets and a slogan that
promises that if it doesn't execute your market
order within 60 seconds, you don't have to pay
the $9.99 commission.

With day-traders thriving and Datek taking off,
Island's volume has swelled to 34 million shares
per day recently. Already Island accounts for
more than 4% of Nasdaq share volume. In
February a full 56% of Island's executions were
matched in-house—meaning Nasdaq was not
involved at all.

There are now at least four other new electronic
communications networks (see chart), including a
fast-growing ECN from Bloomberg called
Bloomberg Tradebook and one from
marketmaker firm Spear, Leeds & Kellogg.
More are on the way.

So Adam Smith is alive and well on Wall Street.
According to a study done at Rutgers University,
these networks were 1.7 times as likely to quote
increments such as 1/16, 3/16 or 11/16 than
marketmakerswho more often traded in
increments of 1/8 or 1/4.

FORBES checked to see how responsive the ECNs
were at posting limit orders. One recent
afternoon we telephoned marketmaker Herzog,
Heine, Geduld with an inside bid. Four minutes
passedfor two of them we were on holdbefore
our bid for 100 shares appeared on a Nasdaq
marketmaker screen.

We next tried Web broker E*Trade: It took
E*Trade two minutes also, then our limit order
was posted by Bloomberg Tradebook.

We next tried Datek Online, which uses Island to
post limit orders. From the time we gave the
order, just three seconds passed before it hit the
Nasdaq screen.

In their personalities and demeanor as well as in
their business techniques, Levine and Citron are a
challenge to the Wall Street establishment. Check
out Island's Web site at www.josh.com. It shows
Levine, 30, and Datek Online's chief technology
officer, Peter Stern, also 30, lounging in jeans and
T shirts. The Web site provides real-time access
to Island's limit-order book in any Nasdaq
stocksomething most other marketmakers guard
with their lives. Levine's lower Manhattan office
suite is home to an 18-inch lizard, three turtles
and an authentic bazooka.

Guerrilla marketmaking has been good to these
boys. In 1996, for example, day-trading firm
Datek Securities paid Citron and Levine almost
$145 million for using software and services like
Island and the Watcher. Citron, 27, has a
Gulfstream II-B, and, as the new chief executive
of Datek Online, has moved headquarters and
duplicative backup systems for Island to Iselin,
N.J. He also paid $3.3 million for the baronial
former home of stock manipulator Robert
Brennana name familiar to longtime FORBES
readers. Once in possession, he called in a
bulldozer and demolished the residence to make
room for a new 20,000-square-foot palace.

So far Island has about 200 broker-dealer
subscribers, including Datek Online, and
day-trading firms. Understandably the big
brokerage firms want no part of it: Though
spreads have narrowed on their over-the-counter
business, that payment for order flow, though
diminished, is still substantial. But maybe not for
long.

The private trading systems aren't going away.
"We would like to trade NYSE stocks," says
Levine.

Are do-it-yourself marketmakers helping or
hurting the small investor? Tell us at On-Line
Pulse.