Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DYNAMIC WEB (DWEB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stock Watcher who wrote (29)	1/16/1999 12:41:00 PM
From: KHS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 189

I talked to the CEO yesterday on the phone. thought it would be a good time to get him with bad weather in NJ and Friday afternoon. Very enthusiastic and willing to talk about his company and their market. I did not ask him any Q's concerning financing and future rev's, I am sure he would have had to decline anyway. I think money will come their way as long as they show contract wins. I also suggested they communicate to this discussion board. Not hype but facts and clarification. They need exposure and it can only help to use SI in a constructive way.

To: Stock Watcher who wrote (29)	1/16/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: DWEB IR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 189

Sorry Stock Watcher ... I can't disclose any nonpublic information here. I'm on a very short leash when commenting in here. My last post was nothing but a reference to other public information ... that's OK. In case you haven't seen it this was my formal introduction to the group which lays out my charter here: Message 4408310 As to some of the questions/issues you raised: I can refer you to a research report available on our web site (you will need an Acrobat reader) which does a pretty good job of laying out our business model and our revenue sources: dynamicweb.com and a recent subscriber milestone announcement as well which is somewhat of a progress report of signups: biz.yahoo.com I can also clarify this about our relationships with SMC, RAD, GTE and RJA, respectively. They are traditional in every sense (i.e. customers pay vendors and investment banking engagements are between peers not customer/consultant). It's an interesting commentary on our time that it's necessary to explicitly clarify what should be obvious and ordinarily assumed ("It depends on what the meaning of 'is' 'is'" President Clinton in his Grand Jury testimony - circa Aug. 1998). I hope this helps. PS. I've got nothing against OMKT ... I was just pointing out how common it is for Internet companies of all walks of life, AMZN, OMKT, EXDS, CYCH and DWEB, to have substantial accumulated deficits.