Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: barbara sperino who wrote (23175)	1/17/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: jdcpa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Great post, Barb!!!

To: barbara sperino who wrote (23175)	1/18/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: jhild	Respond to of 43774

If you notice this posts says last tuesday not yesterday. Which means that he visited the office on Jan. 5. I regret to inform Barbara, but your interpretation is not supported by the evidence at all. When someone posts on Friday, January 15th, that they went last "Tuesday", the only possible interpretation, absent his complete misstatement, is that he was referring to Tuesday the 12th. At least reasonable people would conclude this. The weather on Jan 5th would be no factor. Your attempt to create a revisionist view of this, I fear, is born of your denial to thinking that John Schmitz would misrepresent things to you. Open your mind and stop boycotting the truth. As it turns out I did consider the possibility that the dates were different. However, when I realized that he was telling you on Wednesday that they were overflowed, and that the record shows that just the day before there were only "around 12 traders" during that visit, I found the immediacy of it startling. So I posted it. That John may have lied to you, I think is something that you should address directly with John, rather than assail my integrity in posting something that is so clearly written in the record.